» Articles » PMID: 12728068

Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Monitoring Improved Metabolic Control in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: a Controlled Crossover Study

Overview
Journal Pediatrics
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2003 May 3
PMID 12728068
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To improve metabolic control and prevent complications, both acute and late, we need to adjust treatment on the basis of the blood glucose (BG) profile, as not even the most active BG self-monitoring gives sufficient information.

Design: We have used Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS; Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) in a controlled crossover study including 27 diabetic patients aged 12.5 +/- 3.3 (mean; standard deviation; range: 5-19) years. All patients were treated with intensive insulin therapy, 14 with multiple injections, and 13 with pumps. The patients were randomized into an open or blind study arm. Both arms wore the CGMS sensor for 3 days every 2 weeks. CGMS profiles were used in the open study arm to adjust insulin therapy at follow-up visits every 6 weeks. Both the patients and the diabetes team were masked to the CGMS profiles in the blinded arm, and insulin therapy adjustments were based solely on 7-point BG profiles performed by the patients. At 3 months the 2 study arms were crossed over.

Results: Despite initial problems with a device new to both patients and the diabetes team, hemoglobin A(1)C decreased significantly in the open arm (from 7.70%-7.31%) but not in the blind arm (7.75%-7.65%). A total of 26/27 patients experienced daytime low subcutaneous glucose (<3.0 mmol/L;.8 episodes/day; duration 58 +/- 29 minutes; 5.5% of total time), and 27/27 patients had at least 1 nocturnal episode of low subcutaneous glucose (.4 episodes/night; duration 132 +/- 81 minutes; 10.1% of total time).

Conclusions: Use of CGMS facilitated an improved treatment, and patients received new insight and increased motivation. In this study, we found CGMS to be a useful tool for education and improving metabolic control.

Citing Articles

6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.

ElSayed N, Aleppo G, Aroda V, Bannuru R, Brown F, Bruemmer D Diabetes Care. 2022; 46(Suppl 1):S97-S110.

PMID: 36507646 PMC: 9810469. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-S006.


Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia.

Goldenberg R, Aroda V, Billings L, Christiansen A, Meller Donatsky A, Rizi E Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(11):2572-2581.

PMID: 34322967 PMC: 9290717. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14504.


Two Decades of Research in Artificial Pancreas: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis.

Leon-Vargas F, Arango Oviedo J, Wandurraga H J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021; 16(2):434-445.

PMID: 33853377 PMC: 8861788. DOI: 10.1177/19322968211005500.


Monitoring of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.

Marks B, Wolfsdorf J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020; 11:128.

PMID: 32256447 PMC: 7089921. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00128.


Insulin pump initiation and education for children and adolescents - a qualitative study of current practice in New Zealand.

AbdulAziz Y, Al-Sallami H, Wiltshire E, Rayns J, Willis J, McClintock J J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019; 18(1):59-64.

PMID: 31275875 PMC: 6582118. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-019-00390-6.