» Articles » PMID: 1269918

The Distribution of Enzyme and Inversion Polymorphism over the Genome of Drosophila: Evidence Against Balancing Selection

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1976 May 1
PMID 1269918
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In species of repleta group of Drosophila about 70% of the electrophoretic variability is absorbed by the same chromosome which absorbs about 70% of the cytological variability of the group. However, this does not imply that inversions are actively involved in the maintenance of protein variation. A comparison of cytological and electrophoretic variation of homologous chromosomes points out that the amount of cytological polymorphism varies greatly over species of Drosophila while electrophoretic variation does not. This suggests that allelozymes do not constitute part of the coadapted complexes of genes characterizing the inversions. Rather, the amount of electropheptide molecule and is largely independent of factors such as background genotype and differences in the environment.

Citing Articles

Toward a physical map of Drosophila buzzatii. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic dna polymorphisms and sequence-tagged site landmarks.

Laayouni H, Santos M, Fontdevila A Genetics. 2000; 156(4):1797-816.

PMID: 11102375 PMC: 1461379. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1797.


Molecular evolution of two linked genes, Est-6 and Sod, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Balakirev E, Balakirev E, Rodriguez-Trelles F, Ayala F Genetics. 1999; 153(3):1357-69.

PMID: 10545464 PMC: 1460820. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1357.


Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group.

Ranz J, Segarra C, Ruiz A Genetics. 1997; 145(2):281-95.

PMID: 9071584 PMC: 1207795. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.281.


Distribution of genetic diversity in relation to chromosomal inversions in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Mathiopoulos K, Lanzaro G J Mol Evol. 1995; 40(6):578-84.

PMID: 7643407 DOI: 10.1007/BF00160504.


Differential response to environmental alcohol among second-chromosome arrangements in experimental populations of Drosophila buzzatii.

Ruiz A, Santos M, Fontdevila A Genetica. 1987; 75(3):219-29.

PMID: 3505227 DOI: 10.1007/BF00123577.


References
1.
Muki T, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi O . The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XII. Linkage disequilibrium in a large local population. Genetics. 1974; 77(4):771-93. PMC: 1213167. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/77.4.771. View

2.
Ota T . Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature. 1974; 252(5482):351-4. DOI: 10.1038/252351a0. View

3.
Prakash S, Lewontin R, Hubby J . A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969; 61(4):841-58. PMC: 1212247. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. View

4.
Prakash S . Patterns of gene variation in central and marginal populations of Drosophila robusta. Genetics. 1973; 75(2):347-69. PMC: 1213014. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/75.2.347. View

5.
Zouros E . Genic versus chromosomal variation in natural populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics. 1974; 78(4):1223-44. PMC: 1213250. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/78.4.1223. View