» Articles » PMID: 12676925

Chk1 Mediates S and G2 Arrests Through Cdc25A Degradation in Response to DNA-damaging Agents

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2003 Apr 5
PMID 12676925
Citations 127
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

UV and ionizing radiation (IR) activate DNA damage checkpoints and induce Cdc25A degradation (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429; Falck, J., Mailand, N., Syljuasen, R. G., Bartek, J., and Lukas J. (2001) Nature 410, 842-847). The degradation of Cdc25A is abrogated by caffeine, which implicates Chk1 as the potential mediator (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429). However, the involvement of Chk1 is far from clear, because caffeine is a rather nonspecific inhibitor of the ATR/Chk1 signaling pathway. Additionally, it is not known whether DNA-damaging drugs commonly used in chemotherapy, which may activate different signal transduction pathways than UV or IR, also confer Cdc25A degradation. Herein, we show that camptothecin and doxorubicin, two widely used topoisomerase inhibitors conferring S and G2 arrest, respectively, cause the degradation of Cdc25A. Using a small interfering RNA that enables the specific elimination of Chk1 expression, we show that the observed proteolysis of Cdc25A is mediated through Chk1. Moreover, Cdc25A overexpression abrogates the Chk1-mediated degradation and overcomes the doxorubicin-induced G2 arrest through dephosphorylation and activation of Cdc2/Cdk1 in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that: (a) Cdc25A is involved in the G2/M transition in addition to its commonly accepted effect on G1/S progression, and (b) Chk1 mediates both S and G2 checkpoint and is thus a more ubiquitous cell cycle checkpoint mediator than previously thought.

Citing Articles

Systematic transcriptomic analysis and temporal modelling of human fibroblast senescence.

Scanlan R, Pease L, OKeefe H, Martinez-Guimera A, Rasmussen L, Wordsworth J Front Aging. 2024; 5:1448543.

PMID: 39267611 PMC: 11390594. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1448543.


PPM1F regulates ovarian cancer progression by affecting the dephosphorylation of ITGB1.

Leng Y, Luan Z, Li Z, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Liu J Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39133386 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03614-1.


Musashi-2 (MSI2) regulation of DNA damage response in lung cancer.

Bychkov I, Deneka A, Topchu I, Pangeni R, Ismail A, Lengner C Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38659828 PMC: 11042440. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4021568/v1.


Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies: ATR and CHK1/2 as Promising Targets.

Sofianidi A, Dumbrava E, Syrigos K, Nasrazadani A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38539474 PMC: 10969473. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061139.


Investigations of the novel checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor SRA737 in non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer cells of differing gene status.

Duabil A, Cooper C, Aldujaily E, Halford S, Hirschberg S, Katugampola S Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 4(5):1210-1226.

PMID: 38214010 PMC: 10776598. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00193.