» Articles » PMID: 12649434

Unexpected Similarity in Regulation Between an Archaeal Inositol Monophosphatase/fructose Bisphosphatase and Chloroplast Fructose Bisphosphatase

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2003 Mar 22
PMID 12649434
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hyperthermophilic archaea have an unusual phosphatase that exhibits activity toward both inositol-1-phosphate and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, activities carried out by separate gene products in eukaryotes and bacteria. The structures of phosphatases from Archaeoglobus fulgidus (AF2372) and Methanococcus jannaschii (MJ0109), both anaerobic organisms, resemble the dimeric unit of the tetrameric pig kidney fructose bisphosphatase (FBPase). A striking feature of AF2372, but not of MJ0109, is that the sulfhydryl groups of two cysteines, Cys150 and Cys186, are in close proximity (4 A). A similar arrangement of cysteines has been observed in chloroplast FBPases that are regulated by disulfide formation controlled by redox signaling pathways (ferredoxin/thioredoxin). This mode of regulation has not been detected in any other FBPase enzymes. Biochemical assays show that the AF2372 phosphatase activity can be abolished by incubation with O(2). Full activity is restored by incubation with thiol-containing compounds. Neither the C150S variant of AF2372 nor the equivalent phosphatase from M. jannaschii loses activity with oxidation. Oxidation experiments using Escherichia coli thioredoxin, in analogy with the chloroplast FBPase system, indicate an unexpected mode of regulation for AF2372, a key phosphatase in this anaerobic sulfate reducer.

Citing Articles

Characterization of recombinant fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene mutations: evidence of inhibition/activation of FBPase protein by gene mutation.

Topaz G, Epiter-Smith V, Robalo C, Emad M, Ford V, Daley J Biosci Rep. 2019; 39(2).

PMID: 30683805 PMC: 6386767. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20180960.


Organic compatible solutes of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms.

Roberts M Saline Syst. 2005; 1:5.

PMID: 16176595 PMC: 1224877. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1448-1-5.

References
1.
Liang J, Zhang Y, Huang S, Lipscomb W . Allosteric transition of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(6):2132-6. PMC: 46039. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2132. View

2.
Ke H, Zhang Y, Lipscomb W . Crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase complexed with fructose 6-phosphate, AMP, and magnesium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(14):5243-7. PMC: 54299. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5243. View

3.
Nelson S, Iancu C, Choe J, Honzatko R, FROMM H . Tryptophan fluorescence reveals the conformational state of a dynamic loop in recombinant porcine fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Biochemistry. 2000; 39(36):11100-6. DOI: 10.1021/bi000609c. View

4.
Zhang Y, Liang J, Huang S, Lipscomb W . Toward a mechanism for the allosteric transition of pig kidney fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. J Mol Biol. 1994; 244(5):609-24. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1755. View

5.
Ruelland . Regulation of chloroplast enzyme activities by thioredoxins: activation or relief from inhibition?. Trends Plant Sci. 1999; 4(4):136-141. DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01391-6. View