» Articles » PMID: 12620431

Detection of the Subendometrial Vascularization Flow Index by Three-dimensional Ultrasound May Be Useful for Predicting the Pregnancy Rate for Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2003 Mar 7
PMID 12620431
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To obtain quantitative data on endometrial volume and subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional ultrasound clue to endometrial receptivity.

Design: A prospective, nonrandomized clinical study.

Setting: One tertiary center for assisted reproduction.

Patient(s): Fifty-four patients aged <38 years with normal basal serum FSH level experiencing their first IVF cycle, whose uteri were morphologically normal as confirmed by 3-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound, were studied.

Intervention(s): Ultrasound evaluation was performed for all patients with 3-D facility by a single operator on the day of hCG administration.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Ultrasonographic parameters and conception rates.

Result(s): Subendometrial vascularization flow index (VFI) in predicting the pregnancy rate of IVF was superior to that using vascularization index, flow index, or endometrial volume in the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. The best prediction rate was achieved by a VFI cutoff value of >0.24.

Conclusion(s): The detection of subendometrial blood flow by 3-D power Doppler ultrasound may be a useful ultrasound parameter in the prediction of pregnancy rate of IVF, especially subendometrial VFI.

Citing Articles

Subendometrial blood flow detected by Doppler ultrasound associates with pregnancy outcomes of frozen embryo transfer in patients with thin endometrium.

Zang Z, Lyu J, Yan Y, Zhong M, Zhang Q, Zhang G J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(10):2625-2633.

PMID: 39276274 PMC: 11534959. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03245-z.


Pregnancy prediction via ultrasound-detected endometrial blood for hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer: a prospective observational study.

Ke X, Liang X, Lin Y, Wang F Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1):112.

PMID: 38001517 PMC: 10668347. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01164-9.


Ultrasound‑assessed endometrial receptivity measures for the prediction of in vitro fertilization‑embryo transfer clinical pregnancy outcomes: A meta‑analysis and systematic review.

Wu J, Sheng J, Wu X, Wu Q Exp Ther Med. 2023; 26(3):453.

PMID: 37614426 PMC: 10443051. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.12152.


Role of three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonography and leukemia inhibitory factor from endometrial secretion in predicting endometrial receptivity in IVF treatment: a pilot study.

Sini I, Handayani N, Harahap A, Boediono A, Wiweko B, Hadisaputra W Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(1):259-265.

PMID: 35224652 PMC: 9300517. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06450-2.


Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Martins R, Oliani A, Oliani D, de Oliveira J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):663.

PMID: 33143675 PMC: 7640386. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03372-2.