» Articles » PMID: 24592022

Three-dimensional Ultrasound As a Predictor of Pregnancy in Patients Undergoing ART

Overview
Date 2014 Mar 5
PMID 24592022
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different ultrasound parameters have been used to assess endometrial receptivity during ART treatment, including endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, endometrial volume, Doppler of uterine arteries and endometrial blood flow. However, conflicting results have been reported with regard to their role in the prediction of pregnancy in ART treatment. The 3D ultrasound with power Doppler provides a unique tool with which to examine the blood supply of the whole endometrium and subendometrial region. Volume assessment can also be precisely performed by 3D ultrasound. Based on a med-line research and on our experience, the clinical use of 3D ultrasound is discussed in this review article.

Citing Articles

Automated endometrial identification and volume calculation in normal uteri using a novel smart ERA technique.

Wang Y, Liu X, Sun R, Wei N, Li X, Zou Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20525.

PMID: 39227624 PMC: 11371911. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71069-z.


Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective.

Jirge P, Patil M, Gutgutia R, Shah J, Govindarajan M, Roy V J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022; 15(2):112-125.

PMID: 35928474 PMC: 9345274. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_59_22.


The Endometrial Immune Profiling May Positively Affect the Management of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Cheloufi M, Kazhalawi A, Pinton A, Rahmati M, Chevrier L, Prat-Ellenberg L Front Immunol. 2021; 12:656701.

PMID: 33841443 PMC: 8024694. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.656701.


Letrozole Versus Clomiphene Citrate and Natural Cycle: Endometrial Receptivity During Implantation Window in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Wang L, Lv S, Li F, Bai E, Yang X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 11:532692.

PMID: 33537000 PMC: 7848032. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.532692.


The role of color Doppler in assisted reproduction: A narrative review.

Sharma N, Saravanan M, Saravanan Mbbs L, Narayanan S Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020; 17(11):779-788.

PMID: 31911960 PMC: 6906874. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5484.


References
1.
Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S . Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 5(4):233-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x. View

2.
Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Hartl J, Polz W, Tews G . Three-dimensional endometrial volume estimation as a predictor of pituitary down-regulation in an IVF-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(8):1698-702. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1698. View

3.
Lee A, Sator M, Kratochwil A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G . Endometrial volume change during spontaneous menstrual cycles: volumetry by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 1997; 68(5):831-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00362-2. View

4.
Kyei-Mensah A, Zaidi J, Pittrof R, Shaker A, Campbell S, Tan S . Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of follicular volume measurements. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65(2):371-6. View

5.
Zollner U, Zollner K, Specketer M, Blissing S, Muller T, Steck T . Endometrial volume as assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound is a predictor of pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(6):1515-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.004. View