» Articles » PMID: 12586673

Patients' Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information in Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2003 Feb 15
PMID 12586673
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess patients' preferred method of consent for the use of information from electronic medical records for research.

Design: Interviews and a structured survey of patients in practices with electronic medical records.

Setting: Family practices in southern Ontario, Canada.

Participants: 123 patients: 17 were interviewed and 106 completed a survey.

Main Outcome Measures: Patients' opinions and concerns on use of information from their medical records for research and their preferences for method of consent.

Results: Most interviewees were willing to allow the use of their information for research purposes, although the majority preferred that consent was sought first. The seeking of consent was considered an important element of respect for the individual. Most interviewees made little distinction between identifiable and anonymised data. Research sponsored by private insurance firms generated the greatest concern, and research sponsored by foundation the least. Sponsorship by drug companies evoked negative responses during interview and positive responses in the survey.

Conclusions: Patients are willing to allow information from their medical records to be used for research, but most prefer to be asked for consent either verbally or in writing.

Citing Articles

Sharing data matters: exploring the attitudes of older consumers on an emerging healthy ageing data platform using electronic health records for research.

Naude K, Snowdon D, Parker E, McNaney R, Srikanth V, Andrew N BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025; 32(1.

PMID: 39753271 PMC: 11751950. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101126.


Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.

Cumyn A, Menard J, Barton A, Dault R, Levesque F, Ethier J J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45002.

PMID: 37052967 PMC: 10141314. DOI: 10.2196/45002.


US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences and Impede Public Health and Research: Survey Study.

Schmit C, Giannouchos T, Ramezani M, Zheng Q, Morrisey M, Kum H J Med Internet Res. 2022; 23(7):e25266.

PMID: 36260399 PMC: 8406123. DOI: 10.2196/25266.


Patient consent preferences on sharing personal health information during the COVID-19 pandemic: "the more informed we are, the more likely we are to help".

Tosoni S, Voruganti I, Lajkosz K, Mustafa S, Phillips A, Kim S BMC Med Ethics. 2022; 23(1):53.

PMID: 35596210 PMC: 9122733. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00790-z.


Exploring public concerns for sharing and governance of personal health information: a focus group study.

McCormick J, Hopkins M JAMIA Open. 2021; 4(4):ooab098.

PMID: 34926998 PMC: 8672933. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab098.


References
1.
Woodward B . Challenges to human subject protections in US medical research. JAMA. 1999; 282(20):1947-52. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.20.1947. View

2.
Mitchell E, Sullivan F . A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001; 322(7281):279-82. PMC: 26582. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279. View

3.
Mandl K, Szolovits P, Kohane I . Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ. 2001; 322(7281):283-7. PMC: 1119527. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.283. View

4.
Upshur R, Morin B, Goel V . The privacy paradox: laying Orwell's ghost to rest. CMAJ. 2001; 165(3):307-9. PMC: 81333. View