» Articles » PMID: 12573063

Active Formation of Mixed-species Grouse Leks: a Role for Predation in Lek Evolution?

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2003 Feb 8
PMID 12573063
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavioural ecologists have interpreted avian leks as products of sexual selection, in which males display socially to increase their opportunities to mate. However, without invoking reproductive queuing or kin selection, this paradigm does not necessarily explain why many males that fail to mate participate in leks. An alternative solution, that males also aggregate to reduce predation, has previously lacked compelling support. We show that mixed-species leks, comprising two congeneric grouse, form when single males or small groups of one species, the greater prairie chicken Tympanuchus cupido, join leks of another, the sharp-tailed grouse T. phasianellus. We documented the process by observing lek dynamics and comparing group sizes between mixed- and single-species leks. Joining implies that prairie chickens benefit from displaying with sharp-tailed grouse. The numbers of females of each species attending a lek increased with the number of conspecific, but not heterospecific, males. This suggests that the joining of heterospecifics is unlikely to increase mating opportunities, and leaves lowered predation risk as the most likely benefit of associating with heterospecifics. Active formation of mixed-species leks therefore suggests that predation may be sufficient to drive lek formation. The benefits of participation in mixed leks may be asymmetrical because prairie chickens display more and are less vigilant than sharp-tailed grouse.

Citing Articles

Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores.

Saltz J, Palmer M, Beaudrot L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1878):20220105.

PMID: 37066657 PMC: 10107273. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0105.


Friendship across species borders: factors that facilitate and constrain heterospecific sociality.

Sridhar H, Guttal V Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1746).

PMID: 29581399 PMC: 5882984. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0014.


Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: singing and listening in the social environment.

Greenfield M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014; 201(1):143-54.

PMID: 25236356 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0938-7.


Methyl 2,4,6-decatrienoates attract Stink bugs and tachinid parasitoids.

Aldrich J, Khrimian A, Camp M J Chem Ecol. 2007; 33(4):801-15.

PMID: 17334917 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9270-9.


Structural and functional analysis of Aplysia attractins, a family of water-borne protein pheromones with interspecific attractiveness.

Painter S, Cummins S, Nichols A, Akalal D, Schein C, Braun W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(18):6929-33.

PMID: 15118100 PMC: 406444. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306339101.

References
1.
McDonald D, Potts W . Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science. 1994; 266(5187):1030-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.7973654. View

2.
Noe R, Bshary R . The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proc Biol Sci. 1997; 264(1379):253-9. PMC: 1688237. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0036. View

3.
Wiley R . Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Q Rev Biol. 1974; 49(3):201-27. DOI: 10.1086/408083. View

4.
Dolby , Grubb jr TC . Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(2):501-509. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0808. View