» Articles » PMID: 12566020

Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluating Diabetic Macular Edema Before and After Vitrectomy

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2003 Feb 5
PMID 12566020
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To report the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for evaluation of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) before and after vitrectomy.

Design: Interventional case series.

Methods: A retrospective study was made of 15 consecutive eyes of 13 patients that had vitrectomy for diffuse DME and OCT preoperatively and postoperatively. In seven eyes of six patients (group 1), vitrectomy was performed because of vitreomacular traction observed on biomicroscopy or OCT. In the other eight eyes of seven patients (group 2), vitrectomy was performed for DME not responsive to laser photocoagulation, with no vitreomacular traction on biomicroscopy or OCT.

Results: Mean +/- standard deviation (SD) follow-up after vitrectomy was 18 +/- 10 months (range, 6 to 33 months). In group 1, mean +/- SD retinal thickness decreased significantly from 661 +/- 181 microm preoperatively to 210 +/- 32 microm at the end of follow-up (P =.018). Median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 20/100 before surgery (range, 20/250 to 20/50) to 20/80 at the end of follow-up (range, 20/250 to 20/25; P =.046). In one eye in group 1, vitreomacular traction was only observed on OCT and not on biomicroscopy. In group 2, mean +/- SD retinal thickness decreased from 522 +/- 103 microm preoperatively to 428 +/- 121 microm at the end of follow-up (P =.2). Median BCVA was 20/100 before vitrectomy (range, 20/320 to 20/63) and 20/200 at the end of follow-up (range, 20/250 to 20/63; P =.78).

Conclusions: Vitrectomy was beneficial in eyes with diffuse DME combined with vitreomacular traction but not in eyes without traction. Optical coherence tomography allowed diagnosis of subtle vitreomacular traction and provided precise preoperative and postoperative assessments of macular thickness.

Citing Articles

Association of Retinal Thickness at Month 1 Postrandomization With Later Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Vein Occlusion.

Scott I, Oden N, Ip M, VanVeldhuisen P, Blodi B Am J Ophthalmol. 2024; 266:110-117.

PMID: 38705553 PMC: 11402581. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.027.


SCORE2 Report 24: Nonlinear Relationship of Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal and Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

Scott I, Oden N, VanVeldhuisen P, Ip M, Blodi B Ophthalmology. 2023; 130(10):1066-1072.

PMID: 37220815 PMC: 10524366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.05.023.


Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective.

Yuen Y, Gilhotra J, Dalton M, Aujla J, Mehta H, Wickremasinghe S J Ophthalmol. 2023; 2023:6329819.

PMID: 36824442 PMC: 9943607. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6329819.


Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in recalcitrant diabetic macular edema with and without traction in Indian patients.

Vikas S, Agarwal D, Seth S, Kumar A, Kumar A Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(11):3297-3301.

PMID: 34708792 PMC: 8725148. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1271_21.


En face image-based classification of diabetic macular edema using swept source optical coherence tomography.

Fujiwara A, Kanzaki Y, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Shiode Y, Doi S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):7665.

PMID: 33828222 PMC: 8026626. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87440-3.