» Articles » PMID: 12558290

Individual Talker Differences in Voice-onset-time

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2003 Feb 1
PMID 12558290
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual talkers differ in the acoustic properties of their speech, and at least some of these differences are in acoustic properties relevant for phonetic perception. Recent findings from studies of speech perception have shown that listeners can exploit such differences to facilitate both the recognition of talkers' voices and the recognition of words spoken by familiar talkers. These findings motivate the current study, whose aim is to examine individual talker variation in a particular phonetically-relevant acoustic property, voice-onset-time (VOT). VOT is a temporal property that robustly specifies voicing in stop consonants. From the broad literature involving VOT, it appears that individual talkers differ from one another in their VOT productions. The current study confirmed this finding for eight talkers producing monosyllabic words beginning with voiceless stop consonants. Moreover, when differences in VOT due to variability in speaking rate across the talkers were factored out using hierarchical linear modeling, individual talkers still differed from one another in VOT, though these differences were attenuated. These findings provide evidence that VOT varies systematically from talker to talker and may therefore be one phonetically-relevant acoustic property underlying listeners' capacity to benefit from talker-specific experience.

Citing Articles

Introducing the Sisu Voice Matching Test (SVMT): A novel tool for assessing voice discrimination in Chinese.

Xu T, Jiang X, Zhang P, Wang A Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(3):86.

PMID: 39900852 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02608-3.


Infant preference for specific phonetic cue relations in the contrast between voiced and voiceless stops.

Hullebus M, Gafos A, Boll-Avetisyan N, Langus A, Fritzsche T, Hohle B Infancy. 2024; 30(1):e12630.

PMID: 39487102 PMC: 11647195. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12630.


Phonological discrimination and contrast detection in pupillometry.

Chiossi J, Patou F, Ng E, Faulkner K, Lyxell B Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1232262.

PMID: 38023001 PMC: 10646334. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232262.


Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?.

Luthra S Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(1):104-121.

PMID: 37580454 PMC: 10864679. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02355-6.


The Effect of Habitual Speech Rate on Speaker-Specific Processing in English Stop Voicing Perception.

Ting C, Kang Y Lang Speech. 2023; 67(3):692-701.

PMID: 37555541 PMC: 11367799. DOI: 10.1177/00238309231188078.