» Articles » PMID: 37087863

Using TMS to Evaluate a Causal Role for Right Posterior Temporal Cortex in Talker-specific Phonetic Processing

Overview
Journal Brain Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Apr 23
PMID 37087863
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Theories suggest that speech perception is informed by listeners' beliefs of what phonetic variation is typical of a talker. A previous fMRI study found right middle temporal gyrus (RMTG) sensitivity to whether a phonetic variant was typical of a talker, consistent with literature suggesting that the right hemisphere may play a key role in conditioning phonetic identity on talker information. The current work used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test whether the RMTG plays a causal role in processing talker-specific phonetic variation. Listeners were exposed to talkers who differed in how they produced voiceless stop consonants while TMS was applied to RMTG, left MTG, or scalp vertex. Listeners subsequently showed near-ceiling performance in indicating which of two variants was typical of a trained talker, regardless of previous stimulation site. Thus, even though the RMTG is recruited for talker-specific phonetic processing, modulation of its function may have only modest consequences.

Citing Articles

Perceiving and misperceiving speech: lexical and sublexical processing in the superior temporal lobes.

Tolkacheva V, Brownsett S, McMahon K, de Zubicaray G Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(3).

PMID: 38494418 PMC: 10944697. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae087.

References
1.
Newman R, Clouse S, Burnham J . The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(3):1181-96. DOI: 10.1121/1.1348009. View

2.
Varnava A, Stokes M, Chambers C . Reliability of the 'observation of movement' method for determining motor threshold using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2011; 201(2):327-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.016. View

3.
Myers E, Theodore R . Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail. Brain Lang. 2016; 165:33-44. PMC: 5237402. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.11.001. View

4.
Kleinschmidt D . Structure in talker variability: How much is there and how much can it help?. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019; 34(1):43-68. PMC: 6320234. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1500698. View

5.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View