» Articles » PMID: 12540822

Interpretation of Normal Anatomic Structures on Chest Radiography: Comparison of Fuji Computed Radiography (FCR) 5501D with FCR 5000 and Screen-film System

Overview
Date 2003 Jan 24
PMID 12540822
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of Fuji Computed Radiography (FCR) 5501D by comparing it with FCR 5000 and a screen-film system (S/F). Posteroanterior chest radiographs of ten patients with no abnormality on chest CT scans were obtained with FCR 5501D, FCR 5000, and S/F. Six observers (three radiologists and three radio-technologists) evaluated the visibility of nine normal anatomic structures (including lungs, soft tissue, and bones) and overall visibility on each image. Observers scored using a five-point scale on each structure. FCR 5000 showed a significantly higher score in soft tissue and bone structures, and overall visibility compared with S/F, but, there was no significant difference between them in the visibility of all four normal lung structures. Compared with S/F, the score for FCR 5501D was higher in eight of the nine normal structures, including three of the four lung structures (unobscured lung, retrocardiac lung, and subdiaphragmatic lung), and overall visibility. Compared with FCR 5000, the score for FCR 5501D was higher in three normal structures, including two of the four lung structures (unobscured lung and subdiaphragmatic lung), and overall visibility. FCR 5501D was the best among the three techniques to visualize normal anatomic structures, particularly the obscured and unobscured lung.

Citing Articles

Detection of patient setup errors with a portal image - DRR registration software application.

Sutherland K, Ishikawa M, Bengua G, Ito Y, Miyamoto Y, Shirato H J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011; 12(3):3492.

PMID: 21844862 PMC: 5718652. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3492.


[Digital radiography of the chest in pediatric patients].

Puig S Radiologe. 2003; 43(12):1045-50.

PMID: 14668992 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0983-7.

References
1.
HERMAN P, Goldstein J, Balikian J, Sandor T, Hessel S, Drummey J . Visibility and sharpness of lung structure at 90, 140, and 350 kV. Radiology. 1980; 134(3):591-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.134.3.7355202. View

2.
Beute G, Flynn M, EYLER W, Samei E, Spizarny D, ZYLAK C . Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Radiographics. 1998; 18(3):745-54. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599395. View

3.
Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Andersson B, Larusdottir H, Lundin A, Pettersson H . Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor. Acta Radiol. 1989; 30(6):581-6. View

4.
Kiyono K, Sone S, Sakai F, Kawai T, Karakida O, Kasuga T . [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1994; 54(13):1237-44. View

5.
Tabeta H, Takizawa H, Anzaki Y . [Evaluation of FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography) images applied to standard radiography for the diagnosis of chest diseases]. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi. 1990; 28(7):935-43. View