» Articles » PMID: 12499343

Human Serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol Response to Extended Oral Dosing with Cholecalciferol

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2002 Dec 25
PMID 12499343
Citations 426
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The cholecalciferol inputs required to achieve or maintain any given serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration are not known, particularly within ranges comparable to the probable physiologic supply of the vitamin.

Objectives: The objectives were to establish the quantitative relation between steady state cholecalciferol input and the resulting serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration and to estimate the proportion of the daily requirement during winter that is met by cholecalciferol reserves in body tissue stores.

Design: Cholecalciferol was administered daily in controlled oral doses labeled at 0, 25, 125, and 250 micro g cholecalciferol for approximately 20 wk during the winter to 67 men living in Omaha (41.2 degrees N latitude). The time course of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was measured at intervals over the course of treatment.

Results: From a mean baseline value of 70.3 nmol/L, equilibrium concentrations of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol changed during the winter months in direct proportion to the dose, with a slope of approximately 0.70 nmol/L for each additional 1 micro g cholecalciferol input. The calculated oral input required to sustain the serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration present before the study (ie, in the autumn) was 12.5 micro g (500 IU)/d, whereas the total amount from all sources (supplement, food, tissue stores) needed to sustain the starting 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was estimated at approximately 96 micro g (approximately 3800 IU)/d. By difference, the tissue stores provided approximately 78-82 micro g/d.

Conclusions: Healthy men seem to use 3000-5000 IU cholecalciferol/d, apparently meeting > 80% of their winter cholecalciferol need with cutaneously synthesized accumulations from solar sources during the preceding summer months. Current recommended vitamin D inputs are inadequate to maintain serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration in the absence of substantial cutaneous production of vitamin D.

Citing Articles

Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.

Lei S, Zhang X, Song L, Wen J, Zhang Z, Tian J Ann Jt. 2025; 10:1.

PMID: 39981430 PMC: 11836767. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-24-48.


Vitamin D: Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Recommendations for Population Guidelines.

Grant W, Wimalawansa S, Pludowski P, Cheng R Nutrients. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39861407 PMC: 11767646. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020277.


Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines.

Wimalawansa S, Weiss S, Hollis B Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599755 PMC: 11597479. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223969.


Vitamin D Deficiency: Insights and Perspectives from a Five-Year Retrospective Analysis of Children from Northeastern Romania.

Ghiga G, Tarca E, Tarca V, Spoiala E, Paduraru G, Gimiga N Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599595 PMC: 11597251. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223808.


Vitamin D Supplementation Does Not Enhance Gains in Muscle Strength and Lean Body Mass or Influence Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Vitamin D-Insufficient Middle-Aged Men Engaged in Resistance Training.

Savolainen L, Timpmann S, Mooses M, Maestu E, Medijainen L, Lellsaar M Nutrients. 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408324 PMC: 11478703. DOI: 10.3390/nu16193356.