Time-of-flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis?

Overview

Journal AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2002 Nov 13

PMID 12427639

Citations 24

Authors

Paul J Nederkoorn

Yolanda van der Graaf

Bert C Eikelboom

Aad van der Lugt

Lambertus W Bartels

Willem P T M Mali

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Purpose: Time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is commonly used to visualize the carotid arteries; however, flow void artifacts can appear. Our purpose was to determine the frequency and diagnostic meaning of flow voids by using real patient data, as part of a larger study of MRA compared with the criterion standard, digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: In 1997-2000, 390 consecutive patients with sonographic findings suggestive of carotid artery stenosis were included in this study. All patients subsequently underwent three-dimensional (3D) TOF MRA and conventional DSA. The frequency of flow void artifacts on 3D TOF MRA images were compared with stenosis measurements on DSA images.

Results: We recorded 107 flow voids (16%) during 3D TOF MRA of 662 carotid arteries. DSA images were available for comparison in 102 cases. The median percentage of stenosis in this subgroup of flow voids on MRA images was 80%, compared with measurements on DSA images according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Stenoses ranged from 36% to 100% (occlusion). Three flow voids (2.9%) were in the 0-49% range; 11 (10.8%), in the 50-69% range; and 86 (84.3%), in the 70-99% range. Two flow voids (2.0%) represented occlusions. The positive predictive value of a flow void artifact for the presence of severe (70-99%) stenosis was 84.3% (95% CI: 77.3%, 91.4%).

Conclusion: Flow void artifacts represented severe stenosis in most of the arteries. According to our data, the assumption that flow voids on 3D TOF MRA images represent severe stenosis is justified.

Citing Articles

Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 1.5 Tesla Using Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT).

Janssen J, Rose S, Kaya K, Terzis R, Hahnfeldt R, Gertz R Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 35(1):105-114.

PMID: 39316116 PMC: 11832615. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01458-4.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging features of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography signal loss and its relevance to ischemic stroke.

Wang T, Li C, Li S, Tang P, Guo Q, Le Fang Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6820-6829.

PMID: 39281140 PMC: 11400695. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-329.

Personalised simulation of hemodynamics in cerebrovascular disease: lessons learned from a study of diagnostic accuracy.

Behland J, Madai V, Aydin O, Akay E, Kossen T, Hilbert A Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1230402.

PMID: 37771452 PMC: 10523575. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1230402.

The role of neuroimaging in acute stroke.

Dhamija R, Donnan G Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022; 11(Suppl 1):S12-S23.

PMID: 35721451 PMC: 9204117.

Diagnosis of extracranial carotid stenosis by MRA of the brain.

Wu C, Chen S, Chen J, Chung C, Luo C, Yuan W Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12010.

PMID: 34103593 PMC: 8187356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91511-w.

References

Serfaty J, Chirossel P, Chevallier J, Ecochard R, Froment J, Douek P . Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(2):455-63. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750455. View

Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001; 220(1):179-85. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl35179. View

Barnett H, Taylor D, Haynes R, Sackett D, Peerless S, Ferguson G . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(7):445-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701. View

Rothwell P, Pendlebury S, Wardlaw J, Warlow C . Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000; 31(6):1444-50. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1444. View

Blakeley D, Oddone E, Hasselblad V, Simel D, Matchar D . Noninvasive carotid artery testing. A meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122(5):360-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00007. View

Johnston D, Goldstein L . Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology. 2001; 56(8):1009-15. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.8.1009. View

Phan T, Huston 3rd J, Bernstein M, Riederer S, Brown Jr R . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke. 2001; 32(10):2282-6. DOI: 10.1161/hs1001.096046. View

Elgersma O, van Leersum M, Buijs P, van Leeuwen M, van de Schouw Y, Eikelboom B . Changes over time in optimal duplex threshold for the identification of patients eligible for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1998; 29(11):2352-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.11.2352. View

Kagawa R, Moritake K, Shima T, Okada Y . Validity of B-mode ultrasonographic findings in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in comparison with angiographic and clinicopathologic features. Stroke. 1996; 27(4):700-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.4.700. View

10.

. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351(9113):1379-87. View

11.

Hunink M, Polak J, Barlan M, OLeary D . Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160(3):619-25. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430567. View

12.

Gatenby J, McCauley T, Gore J . Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. Med Phys. 1993; 20(4):1049-57. DOI: 10.1118/1.597001. View

13.

Mustert B, Williams D, Prince M . In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 16(3):301-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00304-4. View

14.

Back M, Wilson J, Rushing G, Stordahl N, Linden C, Johnson B . Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.109330. View

15.

Hankey G, Warlow C, Molyneux A . Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990; 53(7):542-8. PMC: 488126. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.542. View

16.

Westwood M, Kelly S, Berry E, Bamford J, Gough M, Airey C . Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 324(7331):198. PMC: 64789. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.198. View

17.

Barnett H, Taylor D, Eliasziw M, Fox A, Ferguson G, Haynes R . Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(20):1415-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002. View

18.

. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1991; 337(8752):1235-43. View

19.

Kent K, Kuntz K, Patel M, Kim D, Klufas R, Whittemore A . Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. JAMA. 1995; 274(11):888-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.274.11.888. View

20.

Davies K, Humphrey P . Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993; 56(9):967-72. PMC: 489730. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.56.9.967. View