» Articles » PMID: 12384354

In Vivo Pharmacodynamics of a New Oxazolidinone (linezolid)

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2002 Oct 18
PMID 12384354
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Linezolid is a new oxazolidinone with activity against gram-positive cocci. We determined the in vivo activity of linezolid against four strains of Staphylococcus aureus (two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] strains and two methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains) and one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (PSSP) strain, two penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae strains, and five penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains. The mice had 10(6.3) to 10(7.7) CFU/thigh before therapy and were then treated for 24 h with 5 to 1,280 mg of linezolid/kg divided into 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 doses. The killing activities after 4 h of therapy ranged from 2.4 to 5.0 log(10) CFU/thigh against S. pneumoniae and 1.35 to 2.2 log(10) CFU/thigh against S. aureus. Increasing doses produced minimal concentration-dependent killing; doses of 20 and 80 mg/kg produced no in vivo postantibiotic effects (PAEs) with PSSP and modest PAEs (3.4 and 3.2 h) with MSSA. Pharmacokinetic studies at doses of 20 and 80 mg/kg by high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis exhibited peak dose values of 0.68 and 0.71 and elimination half-lives of 1.02 and 1.00 h. Linezolid MICs ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 micro g/ml for S. pneumoniae and from 1.0 to 4.0 micro g/ml for S. aureus. A sigmoid dose-response model was used to estimate the dose required to achieve a net bacteriostatic effect over 24 h. Static doses against S. pneumoniae ranged from 22.2 to 97.1 mg/kg/24 h and from 133 to 167 mg/kg/24 h for S. aureus. The 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio was the major parameter determining the efficacy of linezolid against PSSP (R(2) = 82% for AUC/MIC versus 57% for T>MIC and 59% for the peak level in serum/MIC [peak/MIC]). It was difficult to determine the most relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter with S. aureus, although the outcomes correlated slightly better with the 24-h AUC/MIC ratio (R(2) = 75%) than with the other parameters (T>MIC R(2) = 75% and peak/MIC R(2) = 65%). The 24-h AUC/MIC ratio required for a bacteriostatic effect with linezolid varied from 22 to 97 (mean = 48) for pneumococci and from 39 to 167 (mean = 83) for staphylococci. Based upon a pharmacokinetic goal of a 24-h AUC/MIC of 50 to 100, a dosage regimen of 600 mg given either intravenously or orally twice daily would achieve success against organisms with MICs as high as 2 to 4 micro g/ml.

Citing Articles

Preclinical development and characterisation of PP353, a formulation of linezolid for intradiscal administration.

Hagger G, Guest S, Birchall S, Bradley A, Brindley C, Corbett D JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70010.

PMID: 39544355 PMC: 11561648. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70010.


Pharmacokinetics of PP353, a formulation of linezolid for intervertebral disc administration, in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic change Type 1: A first-in-human, Phase 1b, open-label, single-dose study.

Tripathi S, Sneath R, Golash A, Desai P, McHale D, Guest S JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70009.

PMID: 39544354 PMC: 11561661. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70009.


Safety and efficacy of personalised versus standard dosing of linezolid in patients with sepsis (SePkLin): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled and superiority clinical trial protocol.

Bandin-Vilar E, Estany-Gestal A, Cabaleiro T, Rial-Pensado E, Castro-Balado A, Varela-Rey I BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e087465.

PMID: 39477268 PMC: 11529615. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087465.


Dose optimization of TBI-223 for enhanced therapeutic benefit compared to linezolid in antituberculosis regimen.

Strydom N, Ernest J, Imperial M, P Solans B, Wang Q, Tasneen R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7311.

PMID: 39181887 PMC: 11344811. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50781-4.


Central Nervous System Antimicrobial Exposure and Proposed Dosing for Anthrax Meningitis.

Bradley J, Bulitta J, Cook R, Yu P, Iwamoto C, Hesse E Clin Infect Dis. 2024; 78(6):1451-1457.

PMID: 38412060 PMC: 11175673. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae093.


References
1.
Schulin T, Moellering Jr R, Eliopoulos G . Activities of the oxazolidinones linezolid and eperezolid in experimental intra-abdominal abscess due to Enterococcus faecalis or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43(12):2873-6. PMC: 89579. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.12.2873. View

2.
Noskin G, Siddiqui F, Stosor V, Hacek D, Peterson L . In vitro activities of linezolid against important gram-positive bacterial pathogens including vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43(8):2059-62. PMC: 89415. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.8.2059. View

3.
Murray B . Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(10):710-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421007. View

4.
Peng G, Stryd R, Murata S, Igarashi M, Chiba K, Aoyama H . Determination of linezolid in plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000; 20(1-2):65-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00310-0. View

5.
Gee T, Ellis R, Marshall G, Andrews J, Ashby J, Wise R . Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of linezolid following multiple oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45(6):1843-6. PMC: 90555. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1843-1846.2001. View