» Articles » PMID: 12384334

Defining and Combating the Mechanisms of Triclosan Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus

Abstract

The MICs of triclosan for 31 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were 0.016 micro g/ml (24 strains), 1 to 2 micro g/ml (6 strains), and 0.25 micro g/ml (1 strain). All the strains for which triclosan MICs were elevated (>0.016 micro g/ml) showed three- to fivefold increases in their levels of enoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) reductase (FabI) production. Furthermore, strains for which triclosan MICs were 1 to 2 micro g/ml overexpressed FabI with an F204C alteration. Binding studies with radiolabeled NAD(+) demonstrated that this change prevents the formation of the stable triclosan-NAD(+)-FabI complex, and both this alteration and its overexpression contributed to achieving MICs of 1 to 2 micro g/ml for these strains. Three novel, potent inhibitors of FabI (50% inhibitory concentrations, < or =64 nM) demonstrated up to 1,000-fold better activity than triclosan against the strains for which triclosan MICs were elevated. None of the compounds tested from this series formed a stable complex with NAD(+)-FabI. Consequently, although the overexpression of wild-type FabI gave rise to an increase in the MICs, as expected, overexpression of FabI with an F204C alteration did not cause an additional increase in resistance. Therefore, this work identifies the mechanisms of triclosan resistance in S. aureus, and we present three compounds from a novel chemical series of FabI inhibitors which have excellent activities against both triclosan-resistant and -sensitive clinical isolates of S. aureus.

Citing Articles

Conceptualizing the Role of the Microbiome as a Mediator and Modifier in Environmental Health Studies: A Scoping Review of Studies of Triclosan and the Microbiome.

Laue H, Gilmour A, Tirado V, Romano M Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024; 11(1):30-38.

PMID: 38217674 PMC: 10922364. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-024-00428-9.


Emerging evidence-based innovative approaches to control catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a review.

Rajaramon S, Shanmugam K, Dandela R, Solomon A Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1134433.

PMID: 37560318 PMC: 10407108. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1134433.


Personal Care Products as a Contributing Factor to Antimicrobial Resistance: Current State and Novel Approach to Investigation.

Caioni G, Benedetti E, Perugini M, Amorena M, Merola C Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37107085 PMC: 10135053. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040724.


Bacterial Enoyl-Reductases: The Ever-Growing List of Fabs, Their Mechanisms and Inhibition.

Hopf F, Roth C, de Souza E, Galina L, Czeczot A, Machado P Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:891610.

PMID: 35814645 PMC: 9260719. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.891610.


Do Triclosan Sutures Modify the Microbial Diversity of Surgical Site Infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Daoud F, Coppry M, Moore N, Rogues A Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5).

PMID: 35630370 PMC: 9146332. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10050927.


References
1.
Payne D, Miller W, Berry V, Brosky J, Burgess W, Chen E . Discovery of a novel and potent class of FabI-directed antibacterial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46(10):3118-24. PMC: 128775. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.10.3118-3124.2002. View

2.
Cleland W . Statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. Methods Enzymol. 1979; 63:103-38. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)63008-2. View

3.
Bamber A, Neal T . An assessment of triclosan susceptibility in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 1999; 41(2):107-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90047-6. View

4.
Heath R, Rubin J, Holland D, Zhang E, Snow M, Rock C . Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(16):11110-4. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11110. View

5.
Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuthrich K . MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14(1):51-5, 29-32. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00009-4. View