» Articles » PMID: 12381773

Topographical Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion and Ventilation, Assessed by PET in Supine and Prone Humans

Overview
Date 2002 Oct 17
PMID 12381773
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using positron emission tomography (PET) and intravenously injected (13)N(2), we assessed the topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion (Q) and ventilation (V) in six healthy, spontaneously breathing subjects in the supine and prone position. In this technique, the intrapulmonary distribution of (13)N(2), measured during a short apnea, is proportional to regional Q. After resumption of breathing, regional specific alveolar V (sVA, ventilation per unit of alveolar gas volume) can be calculated from the tracer washout rate. The PET scanner imaged 15 contiguous, 6-mm-thick, slices of lung. Vertical gradients of Q and sVA were computed by linear regression, and spatial heterogeneity was assessed from the squared coefficient of variation (CV(2)). Both CV and CV were corrected for the estimated contribution of random imaging noise. We found that 1) both Q and V had vertical gradients favoring dependent lung regions, 2) vertical gradients were similar in the supine and prone position and explained, on average, 24% of Q heterogeneity and 8% of V heterogeneity, 3) CV was similar in the supine and prone position, and 4) CV was lower in the prone position. We conclude that, in recumbent, spontaneously breathing humans, 1) vertical gradients favoring dependent lung regions explain a significant fraction of heterogeneity, especially of Q, and 2) although Q does not seem to be systematically more homogeneous in the prone position, differences in individual behaviors may make the prone position advantageous, in terms of V-to-Q matching, in selected subjects.

Citing Articles

Effect of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with moderate to severe ARDS with different clinical phenotypes.

Yang S, Sun Q, Yuan X, Wang J, Wang H, Hu W Respir Res. 2025; 26(1):70.

PMID: 40022116 PMC: 11871685. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-025-03154-4.


Awake prone positioning and ventilation distribution as assessed by electric impedance tomography in patients with non-COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A prospective physiology study.

Wang J, Chen C, Zhao Z, Deng P, Zhang C, Zhang Y J Intensive Med. 2025; 5(1):43-50.

PMID: 39872842 PMC: 11763897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.07.007.


Interventional study of comparing body pressure in different prone positions in healthy young women.

Sato A, Ajimi A, Omiya Y, Shimizu J J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(9):571-576.

PMID: 39239414 PMC: 11374175. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.571.


Prone positioning does not improve outcomes of intubated patients with pneumocystis pneumonia and moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study.

Wang Z, Zhou Y, Zhu M, Wang F, Zhou Y, Yu H Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):267.

PMID: 38698478 PMC: 11067229. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01868-7.


Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.

Zadek F, Berta L, Zorzi G, Ubiali S, Bonaiti A, Tundo G Respir Care. 2024; 69(11):1380-1391.

PMID: 38594036 PMC: 11549634. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11625.