» Articles » PMID: 12058078

The Bending Rigidity of Mitotic Chromosomes

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Cell
Date 2002 Jun 12
PMID 12058078
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The bending rigidities of mitotic chromosomes isolated from cultured N. viridescens (newt) and Xenopus epithelial cells were measured by observing their spontaneous thermal bending fluctuations. When combined with simultaneous measurement of stretching elasticity, these measurements constrain models for higher order mitotic chromosome structure. We measured bending rigidities of B approximately 10(-22) N. m(2) for newt and approximately 10(-23) N. m(2) for Xenopus chromosomes extracted from cells. A similar bending rigidity was measured for newt chromosomes in vivo by observing bending fluctuations in metaphase-arrested cells. Following each bending rigidity measurement, a stretching (Young's) modulus of the same chromosome was measured in the range of 10(2) to 10(3) Pa for newt and Xenopus chromosomes. For each chromosome, these values of B and Y are consistent with those expected for a simple elastic rod, B approximately YR(4), where R is the chromosome cross-section radius. Our measurements rule out the possibility that chromosome stretching and bending elasticity are principally due to a stiff central core region and are instead indicative of an internal structure, which is essentially homogeneous in its connectivity across the chromosome cross-section.

Citing Articles

Mechanomemory of nucleoplasm and RNA polymerase II after chromatin stretching by a microinjected magnetic nanoparticle force.

Rashid F, Kabbo S, Wang N Cell Rep. 2024; 43(7):114462.

PMID: 39002538 PMC: 11289711. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114462.


Mechanobiology of the nucleus during the G2-M transition.

Lima J, Ferreira J Nucleus. 2024; 15(1):2330947.

PMID: 38533923 PMC: 10978034. DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2024.2330947.


Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.

Leeds B, Kostello K, Liu Y, Nelson C, Biggins S, Asbury C Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38150374 PMC: 10752587. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89467.


Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.

Leeds B, Kostello K, Liu Y, Nelson C, Biggins S, Asbury C bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905093 PMC: 10614740. DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.29.547092.


Structural reorganization and relaxation dynamics of axially stressed chromosomes.

Ruben B, Brahmachari S, Contessoto V, Cheng R, Oliveira Junior A, Di Pierro M Biophys J. 2023; 122(9):1633-1645.

PMID: 36960531 PMC: 10183323. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.03.029.


References
1.
NICKLAS R . How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 1997; 275(5300):632-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5300.632. View

2.
Koshland D, Strunnikov A . Mitotic chromosome condensation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996; 12:305-33. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.305. View

3.
Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K . Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell. 1997; 91(1):35-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80007-6. View

4.
Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A . A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1997; 91(1):47-57. PMC: 2670185. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80008-8. View

5.
Losada A, Hirano M, Hirano T . Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev. 1998; 12(13):1986-97. PMC: 316973. DOI: 10.1101/gad.12.13.1986. View