Elasticity Measurements Show the Existence of Thin Rigid Cores Inside Mitotic Chromosomes

Overview

Journal J Cell Biol

Specialty Cell Biology

Date 1999 Apr 20

PMID 10209019

Citations 23

Authors

B Houchmandzadeh

S Dimitrov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Chromosome condensation is one of the most critical steps during cell division. However, the structure of condensed mitotic chromosomes is poorly understood. In this paper we describe a new approach based on elasticity measurements for studying the structure of in vitro assembled mitotic chromosomes in Xenopus egg extract. The approach is based on a unique combination of measurements of both longitudinal deformability and bending rigidity of whole chromosomes. By using specially designed micropipettes, the chromosome force-extension curve was determined. Analysis of the curvature fluctuation spectrum allowed for the measurement of chromosome bending ridigity. The relationship between the values of these two parameters is very specific: the measured chromosome flexibility was found to be 2,000 times lower than the flexibility calculated from the experimentally determined Young modulus. This requires the chromosome structure to be formed of one or a few thin rigid elastic axes surrounded by a soft envelope. The properties of these axes are well-described by models developed for the elasticity of titin-like molecules. Additionally, the deformability of in vitro assembled chromosomes was found to be very similar to that of native somatic chromosomes, thus demonstrating the existence of an essentially identical structure.

Citing Articles

Structural reorganization and relaxation dynamics of axially stressed chromosomes.

Ruben B, Brahmachari S, Contessoto V, Cheng R, Oliveira Junior A, Di Pierro M Biophys J. 2023; 122(9):1633-1645.

PMID: 36960531 PMC: 10183323. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.03.029.

Simulation of Different Three-Dimensional Models of Whole Interphase Nuclei Compared to Experiments - A Consistent Scale-Bridging Simulation Framework for Genome Organization.

Knoch T Results Probl Cell Differ. 2022; 70:495-549.

PMID: 36348120 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_18.

A Versatile Micromanipulation Apparatus for Biophysical Assays of the Cell Nucleus.

Currey M, Kandula V, Biggs R, Marko J, Stephens A Cell Mol Bioeng. 2022; 15(4):303-312.

PMID: 36119136 PMC: 9474788. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-022-00734-y.

Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes.

Kramer E, Tayjasanant P, Cordone B Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:684278.

PMID: 34249936 PMC: 8262490. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.684278.

One-dimensional spatial patterning along mitotic chromosomes: A mechanical basis for macroscopic morphogenesis.

Chu L, Liang Z, Mukhina M, Fisher J, Hutchinson J, Kleckner N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(43):26749-26755.

PMID: 33051295 PMC: 7604413. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013709117.

References

Hirano T . SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: a conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates?. Genes Dev. 1999; 13(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.1.11. View

Dimitrov S, Dasso M, Wolffe A . Remodeling sperm chromatin in Xenopus laevis egg extracts: the role of core histone phosphorylation and linker histone B4 in chromatin assembly. J Cell Biol. 1994; 126(3):591-601. PMC: 2120139. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.126.3.591. View

Tskhovrebova L, Trinick J, Sleep J, Simmons R . Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature. 1997; 387(6630):308-12. DOI: 10.1038/387308a0. View

Melby T, Ciampaglio C, Briscoe G, Erickson H . The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge. J Cell Biol. 1998; 142(6):1595-604. PMC: 2141774. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.142.6.1595. View

Hirano T . Biochemical and genetic dissection of mitotic chromosome condensation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995; 20(9):357-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89076-3. View

Sedat J, Manuelidis L . A direct approach to the structure of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978; 42 Pt 1:331-50. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.035. View

Marko J, Siggia E . Polymer models of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 1997; 8(11):2217-31. PMC: 25703. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.8.11.2217. View

Ott , Magnasco , Simon , Libchaber . Measurement of the persistence length of polymerized actin using fluorescence microscopy. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1993; 48(3):R1642-R1645. DOI: 10.1103/physreve.48.r1642. View

Rattner J . Integrating chromosome structure with function. Chromosoma. 1992; 101(5-6):259-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00346003. View

10.

Oberhauser A, Marszalek P, Erickson H, Fernandez J . The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin. Nature. 1998; 393(6681):181-5. DOI: 10.1038/30270. View

11.

Poljak L, Kas E . Resolving the role of topoisomerase II in chromatin structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 1995; 5(9):348-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89068-6. View

12.

Saitoh Y, Laemmli U . Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell. 1994; 76(4):609-22. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90502-9. View

13.

Houchmandzadeh B, Marko J, Chatenay D, Libchaber A . Elasticity and structure of eukaryote chromosomes studied by micromanipulation and micropipette aspiration. J Cell Biol. 1997; 139(1):1-12. PMC: 2139812. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.139.1.1. View

14.

Hirano T, Mitchison T, Swedlow J . The SMC family: from chromosome condensation to dosage compensation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995; 7(3):329-36. DOI: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80087-5. View

15.

McDowall A, Smith J, Dubochet J . Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified chromosomes in situ. EMBO J. 1986; 5(6):1395-402. PMC: 1166954. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04373.x. View

16.

Kimura K, Hirano M, Kobayashi R, Hirano T . Phosphorylation and activation of 13S condensin by Cdc2 in vitro. Science. 1998; 282(5388):487-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5388.487. View

17.

Rief M, Gautel M, Oesterhelt F, Fernandez J, Gaub H . Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science. 1997; 276(5315):1109-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.276.5315.1109. View

18.

NICKLAS R . Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1983; 97(2):542-8. PMC: 2112533. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.542. View

19.

OKADA T, Comings D . A search for protein cores in chromosomes: is the scaffold an artifact?. Am J Hum Genet. 1980; 32(6):814-32. PMC: 1686168. View

20.

Hirano T, Mitchison T . Topoisomerase II does not play a scaffolding role in the organization of mitotic chromosomes assembled in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Biol. 1993; 120(3):601-12. PMC: 2119547. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.120.3.601. View