» Articles » PMID: 12019115

Method for Measuring Postantifungal Effect in Aspergillus Species

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2002 May 23
PMID 12019115
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An in vitro method for determination of postantifungal effect (PAFE) in molds was developed by using three isolates each of Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. nidulans, and A. ustus. MICs of amphotericin B and itraconazole were determined by using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (M38-P). The inoculum was prepared in RPMI 1640 broth buffered with MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) at pH 7.0, and conidia were exposed to amphotericin B and itraconazole at concentrations of 4, 1, and 0.25 times the MIC, each for 4, 2, and 1 h at 37 degrees C. The same procedure was followed for controls with drug-free medium. Following exposure, the conidia were washed three times in saline and the numbers of CFU per milliliter were determined. Exposed and control conidia were then inoculated into microtitration plates and incubated at 37 degrees C for 48 h in a spectrophotometer reader. The optical density (OD) was measured automatically at 10-min intervals, resulting in growth curves. PAFE was quantified by comparing three arbitrary points in the control growth curve, the first increase of OD and the points when 20 and 50% of the maximal growth were reached, with the growth curve of drug-exposed conidia. Amphotericin B induced PAFE in A. fumigatus at four times the MIC after 2 and 4 h of exposure ranging from 1.83 to 6.00 h and 9.33 to 10.80 h, respectively. Significantly shorter PAFEs or lack of PAFE was observed for A. terreus, A. ustus, and A. nidulans. Itraconazole did not induce measurable PAFE in the Aspergillus isolates at any concentration or exposure time tested. Further studies are warranted to investigate the implications of PAFE in relation to clinical efficacy and dosing frequency.

Citing Articles

The Utilization of to Design Environmentally Friendly Living Paints with Anti-Mold Properties.

Dorfan Y, Nahami A, Morris Y, Shohat B, Kolodkin-Gal I Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38930607 PMC: 11205451. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061226.


A Novel Antimicrobial Peptide Sparamosin From the Mud Crab Showing Potent Antifungal Activity Against .

Chen Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, Chen H, Chen F, Wang K Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:746006.

PMID: 34690992 PMC: 8531530. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.746006.


Effect of the Novel Antifungal Drug F901318 (Olorofim) on Growth and Viability of Aspergillus fumigatus.

du Pre S, Beckmann N, Almeida M, Sibley G, Law D, Brand A Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(8).

PMID: 29891595 PMC: 6105813. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00231-18.


Nebulised amphotericin B-polymethacrylic acid nanoparticle prophylaxis prevents invasive aspergillosis.

Shirkhani K, Teo I, Armstrong-James D, Shaunak S Nanomedicine. 2015; 11(5):1217-26.

PMID: 25791815 PMC: 4503863. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.02.012.


Single-dose pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B against Aspergillus species in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Al-Saigh R, Siopi M, Siafakas N, Velegraki A, Zerva L, Meletiadis J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57(8):3713-8.

PMID: 23716054 PMC: 3719712. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02484-12.


References
1.
Dannaoui E, Borel E, Persat F, Piens M, Picot S . Amphotericin B resistance of Aspergillus terreus in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. J Med Microbiol. 2000; 49(7):601-606. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-7-601. View

2.
Ernst E, Klepser M, Pfaller M . Postantifungal effects of echinocandin, azole, and polyene antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000; 44(4):1108-11. PMC: 89826. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.1108-1111.2000. View

3.
Dodds E, Drew R, Perfect J . Antifungal pharmacodynamics: review of the literature and clinical applications. Pharmacotherapy. 2000; 20(11):1335-55. DOI: 10.1592/phco.20.17.1335.34901. View

4.
Odenholt I . Pharmacodynamic effects of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001; 17(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00243-0. View

5.
Garcia M, Llorente M, Minguez F, Prieto J . Influence of pH and concentration on the postantifungal effect and on the effects of sub-MIC concentrations of 4 antifungal agents on previously treated Candida spp. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001; 32(6):669-73. DOI: 10.1080/003655400459603. View