» Articles » PMID: 11976111

Salmonella Enterica Infections in Market Swine with and Without Transport and Holding

Overview
Date 2002 Apr 27
PMID 11976111
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare, by using identical sample types, the Salmonella enterica prevalences and serovar diversities between pigs necropsied on the farm and those necropsied at the abattoir after transport and holding. We necropsied 567 market weight pigs (>70 kg) from six herds. Pigs were alternately assigned to be necropsied on the farm or at the abattoir. One-half of the group was sent in clean, disinfected trailers to slaughter at a commercial abattoir. After transport (mean distance, 169 km) and 2 to 3 h of holding in antemortem pens, these pigs were necropsied. The 50 pigs remaining on the farm were necropsied the following day. The same sample types and amounts were collected for S. enterica culture at both locations. Results show a sevenfold-higher (P < 0.001) S. enterica isolation rate from pigs necropsied at the abattoir (39.9%; 114 of 286) than from those necropsied on the farm (5.3%; 15 of 281). This difference was also observed for each individual herd. All sample types showed a significantly higher prevalence when comparing abattoir to on-farm collection, respectively: lymph nodes, 9.15 versus 3.6%; cecal contents, 13.6 versus 1.8%; 1 g of fecal matter, 25.2 versus 0.7%. Recovery of additional serovars at the abattoir suggests the pigs are receiving S. enterica from extra-farm sources. This study demonstrates that rapid infection during transport, and particularly during holding, is a major reason for increased S. enterica prevalence in swine. This finding identifies the holding pen as an important S. enterica control point in the pork production chain.

Citing Articles

Microbiome characterization of two fresh pork cuts during production in a pork fabrication facility.

Asmus A, Gaire T, Schweisthal K, Staben S, Noyes N Microbiol Spectr. 2025; 13(3):e0220924.

PMID: 39882867 PMC: 11878005. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02209-24.


Scoping Review About spp. in Colombian Pig Farms from 2009 to Mid-2024.

Pulido-Villamarin A, Chamorro-Tobar I, Carrascal-Camacho A, Sampedro F, Rodriguez-Moreno M, Rojas-Bermudez F Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682507 PMC: 11640016. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233542.


Control in Swine: A Thoughtful Discussion of the Pre- and Post-Harvest Control Approaches in Industrialized Countries.

Carvajal A, Kramer M, Arguello H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612274 PMC: 11010990. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071035.


Drinking Pipes and Nipple Drinkers in Pig Abattoir Lairage Pens-A Source of Zoonotic Pathogens as a Hazard to Meat Safety.

Buder C, Meemken D, Furstenberg R, Langforth S, Kirse A, Langkabel N Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894212 PMC: 10609512. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102554.


Agar Contact Method as a Valuable Tool to Identify Slaughter Hygiene Deficiencies along the Slaughter Process by Longitudinally Sampling Pig Skin Surfaces.

Furstenberg R, Langkabel N, Grosse-Kleimann J, Kreienbrock L, Meemken D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894170 PMC: 10609102. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102512.


References
1.
Funk J, Davies P, Nichols M . The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2000; 12(5):412-8. DOI: 10.1177/104063870001200504. View

2.
Hansen R, Rogers R, EMGE S, Jacobs N . INCIDENCE OF SALMONELLA IN THE HOG COLON AS AFFECTED BY HANDLING PRACTICES PRIOR TO SLAUGHTER. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1964; 145:139-40. View

3.
Hurd H, McKean J, Wesley I, Karriker L . The effect of lairage on Salmonella isolation from market swine. J Food Prot. 2001; 64(7):939-44. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.7.939. View

4.
Hurd H, Gailey J, McKean J, Rostagno M . Rapid infection in market-weight swine following exposure to a Salmonella typhimurium-contaminated environment. Am J Vet Res. 2001; 62(8):1194-7. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1194. View

5.
WILLIAMS Jr L, Newell K . Patterns of Salmonella excretion in market swine. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967; 57(3):466-71. PMC: 1227179. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.57.3.466. View