Washing and Chilling As Critical Control Points in Pork Slaughter Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems
Overview
Affiliations
Aims: The aim of this research was to examine the effects of preslaughter washing, pre-evisceration washing, final carcass washing and chilling on final carcass quality and to evaluate these operations as possible critical control points (CCPs) within a pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system.
Methods And Results: This study estimated bacterial numbers (total viable counts) and the incidence of Salmonella at three surface locations (ham, belly and neck) on 60 animals/carcasses processed through a small commercial pork abattoir (80 pigs d(-1)). Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers were noted at some stages of the slaughter/dressing process, i.e. the process of hair removal (scalding-dehairing and singeing) resulted in an approx. 4.5 log10 cfu cm(-2) decrease in bacterial numbers. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers was observed after pre-evisceration washing. Final washing increased the bacterial counts to between 3.6 and 3.8 log10 cfu cm(-2) while chilling effected a small but statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase to between 4.5 and 4.7 log10 cfu cm(-2). The incidence of Salmonella on pigs at the farm was 27%, decreasing to 10% after preslaughter washing. However, stunning and bleeding effected a considerable increase in Salmonella contamination and the incidence after these operations was 50%, which was reduced to 0% during the scalding-dehairing process.
Conclusions: Washing the live animals and subsequent carcasses with cold water is not an effective control measure but chilling may be used as a CCP.
Significance And Impact Of The Study: Recent changes in European Union legislation legally mandate HACCP in pork slaughter plants. This research will provide a sound scientific basis on which to develop and implement effective HACCP in pork abattoirs.
Coelho M, Davanzo E, Dos Santos R, Castro V, da Costa H, Dallago B Life (Basel). 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 39459561 PMC: 11508742. DOI: 10.3390/life14101261.
Carvajal A, Kramer M, Arguello H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).
PMID: 38612274 PMC: 11010990. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071035.
Furstenberg R, Langkabel N, Grosse-Kleimann J, Kreienbrock L, Meemken D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).
PMID: 37894170 PMC: 10609102. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102512.
Similar Carcass Surface Microbiota Observed Following Primary Processing of Different Pig Batches.
Braley C, Fravalo P, Gaucher M, Lariviere-Gauthier G, Shedleur-Bourguignon F, Longpre J Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:849883.
PMID: 35694297 PMC: 9184759. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.849883.
The sources and transmission routes of microbial populations throughout a meat processing facility.
Zwirzitz B, Wetzels S, Dixon E, Stessl B, Zaiser A, Rabanser I NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2020; 6(1):26.
PMID: 32651393 PMC: 7351959. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-020-0136-z.