» Articles » PMID: 11972694

Washing and Chilling As Critical Control Points in Pork Slaughter Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems

Overview
Date 2002 Apr 26
PMID 11972694
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this research was to examine the effects of preslaughter washing, pre-evisceration washing, final carcass washing and chilling on final carcass quality and to evaluate these operations as possible critical control points (CCPs) within a pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system.

Methods And Results: This study estimated bacterial numbers (total viable counts) and the incidence of Salmonella at three surface locations (ham, belly and neck) on 60 animals/carcasses processed through a small commercial pork abattoir (80 pigs d(-1)). Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers were noted at some stages of the slaughter/dressing process, i.e. the process of hair removal (scalding-dehairing and singeing) resulted in an approx. 4.5 log10 cfu cm(-2) decrease in bacterial numbers. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in bacterial numbers was observed after pre-evisceration washing. Final washing increased the bacterial counts to between 3.6 and 3.8 log10 cfu cm(-2) while chilling effected a small but statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase to between 4.5 and 4.7 log10 cfu cm(-2). The incidence of Salmonella on pigs at the farm was 27%, decreasing to 10% after preslaughter washing. However, stunning and bleeding effected a considerable increase in Salmonella contamination and the incidence after these operations was 50%, which was reduced to 0% during the scalding-dehairing process.

Conclusions: Washing the live animals and subsequent carcasses with cold water is not an effective control measure but chilling may be used as a CCP.

Significance And Impact Of The Study: Recent changes in European Union legislation legally mandate HACCP in pork slaughter plants. This research will provide a sound scientific basis on which to develop and implement effective HACCP in pork abattoirs.

Citing Articles

and Counts, Virulence Gene Profile, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Biofilm Formation Capacity during Pig Slaughter Stages.

Coelho M, Davanzo E, Dos Santos R, Castro V, da Costa H, Dallago B Life (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39459561 PMC: 11508742. DOI: 10.3390/life14101261.


Control in Swine: A Thoughtful Discussion of the Pre- and Post-Harvest Control Approaches in Industrialized Countries.

Carvajal A, Kramer M, Arguello H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612274 PMC: 11010990. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071035.


Agar Contact Method as a Valuable Tool to Identify Slaughter Hygiene Deficiencies along the Slaughter Process by Longitudinally Sampling Pig Skin Surfaces.

Furstenberg R, Langkabel N, Grosse-Kleimann J, Kreienbrock L, Meemken D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894170 PMC: 10609102. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102512.


Similar Carcass Surface Microbiota Observed Following Primary Processing of Different Pig Batches.

Braley C, Fravalo P, Gaucher M, Lariviere-Gauthier G, Shedleur-Bourguignon F, Longpre J Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:849883.

PMID: 35694297 PMC: 9184759. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.849883.


The sources and transmission routes of microbial populations throughout a meat processing facility.

Zwirzitz B, Wetzels S, Dixon E, Stessl B, Zaiser A, Rabanser I NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2020; 6(1):26.

PMID: 32651393 PMC: 7351959. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-020-0136-z.