» Articles » PMID: 11960030

Individual Differences Versus Social Dynamics in the Formation of Animal Dominance Hierarchies

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2002 Apr 18
PMID 11960030
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Linear hierarchies, the classical pecking-order structures, are formed readily in both nature and the laboratory in a great range of species including humans. However, the probability of getting linear structures by chance alone is quite low. In this paper we investigate the two hypotheses that are proposed most often to explain linear hierarchies: they are predetermined by differences in the attributes of animals, or they are produced by the dynamics of social interaction, i.e., they are self-organizing. We evaluate these hypotheses using cichlid fish as model animals, and although differences in attributes play a significant part, we find that social interaction is necessary for high proportions of groups with linear hierarchies. Our results suggest that dominance hierarchy formation is a much richer and more complex phenomenon than previously thought, and we explore the implications of these results for evolutionary biology, the social sciences, and the use of animal models in understanding human social organization.

Citing Articles

Rapid changes in plasma corticosterone and medial amygdala transcriptome profiles during social status change reveal molecular pathways associated with a major life history transition in mouse dominance hierarchies.

Milewski T, Lee W, Young R, Hofmann H, Curley J PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(1):e1011548.

PMID: 39804961 PMC: 11761145. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011548.


Scale at the interface of spatial and social ecology.

Picardi S, Abrahms B, Merkle J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1912):20220523.

PMID: 39230455 PMC: 11495407. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0523.


Postsynaptic lncRNA Sera/Pkm2 pathway orchestrates the transition from social competition to rank by remodeling the neural ensemble in mPFC.

Zhu L, Lai C, Zhou C, Chen H, Liu Z, Guo Z Cell Discov. 2024; 10(1):87.

PMID: 39160208 PMC: 11333582. DOI: 10.1038/s41421-024-00706-8.


The dissection of a despotic society: exploration, dominance and hormonal traits.

Majelantle T, Ganswindt A, Hart D, Hagenah N, Ganswindt S, Bennett N Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2022):20240371.

PMID: 38714210 PMC: 11095815. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0371.


Aggressiveness predicts dominance rank in greylag geese: mirror tests and agonistic interactions.

Kleindorfer S, Krupka M, Katsis A, Frigerio D, Common L R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(4):231686.

PMID: 38577211 PMC: 10987982. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231686.


References
1.
Hsu , Wolf . The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(4):903-910. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049. View

2.
Hemelrijk . Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(5):1035-1048. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1400. View

3.
Jameson , Appleby , Freeman . Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy based on probabilistic dominance. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(5):991-998. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1077. View

4.
Silk . Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies. Anim Behav. 1999; 58(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1129. View

5.
Savin-Williams R . Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 9(1):75-85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02088381. View