» Articles » PMID: 11934358

Environmental Stress, Inbreeding, and the Nature of Phenotypic and Genetic Variance in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2002 Apr 6
PMID 11934358
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fifty-two lines of Drosophila melanogaster founded by single-pair population bottlenecks were used to study the effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on phenotypic variance, genetic variance and survivorship. Cold temperature and high density cause reduced survivorship, but these stresses do not cause repeatable changes in the phenotypic variance of most wing morphological traits. Wing area, however, does show increased phenotypic variance under both types of environmental stress. This increase is no greater in inbred than in outbred lines, showing that inbreeding does not increase the developmental effects of stress. Conversely, environmental stress does not increase the extent of inbreeding depression. Genetic variance is not correlated with environmental stress, although the amount of genetic variation varies significantly among environments and lines vary significantly in their response to environmental change. Drastic changes in the environment can cause changes in phenotypic and genetic variance, but not in a way reliably predicted by the notion of 'stress'.

Citing Articles

Sexual conflict in a changing environment.

Plesnar-Bielak A, Lukasiewicz A Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 96(5):1854-1867.

PMID: 33960630 PMC: 8518779. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12728.


When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?.

Jordan C, Ally D, Hodgins K Ecol Evol. 2016; 5(24):5962-73.

PMID: 26811768 PMC: 4717339. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1821.


Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata.

Punzalan D, Delcourt M, Rundle H Heredity (Edinb). 2013; 112(2):143-8.

PMID: 24045292 PMC: 3907099. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.85.


Quantitative genetics of body size and timing of maturation in two nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations.

Shimada Y, Shikano T, Kuparinen A, Gonda A, Leinonen T, Merila J PLoS One. 2011; 6(12):e28859.

PMID: 22194929 PMC: 3237540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028859.


The statistical mechanics of a polygenic character under stabilizing selection, mutation and drift.

de Vladar H, Barton N J R Soc Interface. 2010; 8(58):720-39.

PMID: 21084341 PMC: 3061091. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0438.


References
1.
Sgro C, Hoffmann A . Effects of stress combinations on the expression of additive genetic variation for fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1998; 72(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672398003310. View

2.
Fowler K, Whitlock M . The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 266(1433):2061-6. PMC: 1690327. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0887. View

3.
HOFFMANN , Merila . Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(3):96-101. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01595-5. View

4.
Merila J, Fry J . Genetic variation and causes of genotype-environment interaction in the body size of blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Genetics. 1998; 148(3):1233-44. PMC: 1460023. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1233. View

5.
Whitlock M, Fowler K . The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999; 152(1):345-53. PMC: 1460612. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.345. View