» Articles » PMID: 11905199

Effect of Acriflavin on the Kinetoplast of Leishmania Tarentolae. Mode of Action and Physiological Correlates of the Loss of Kinetoplast DNA

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1968 Jun 1
PMID 11905199
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The loss of kinetoplast DNA in Leishmania tarentolae, which occurs in the presence of low concentrations of acriflavin, was found to be a result of selective inhibition of replication of this DNA. Nuclear DNA synthesis was relatively unaffected and cell and kinetoplast division proceeded normally for several generations. An approximately equal distribution of parental kinetoplast DNA between daughter kinetoplasts resulted in a decrease in the average amount of DNA per kinetoplast. The final disappearance of the stainable kinetoplast DNA occurred at a cell division in which all the remaining visible kinetoplast DNA was retained by one of the daughter cells. The selective inhibition of kinetoplast DNA synthesis was caused by a selective localization of acriflavin in the kinetoplast. The apparent intracellular localization of dye and the extent of uptake at a low dye concentration could be manipulated, respectively, by varying the hemin (or protoporphyrin IX) concentration in the medium and by adding red blood cell extract (or hemoglobin). Hemin and protoporphyrin IX were found to form a complex with acriflavin. During growth in acriflavin, cells exhibited an increasing impairment of colony-forming ability and rate of respiration. No change in the electrophoretic pattern of total cell soluble proteins was apparent. The data fit the working hypothesis that the loss of kinetoplast DNA leads to a respiratory defect which then leads to a decrease in biosynthetic reactions and eventual cell death. A possible use of the selective localization of acriflavin in the kinetoplast to photooxidize selectively the kinetoplast DNA is suggested.

Citing Articles

Leishmania tarentolae: Taxonomic classification and its application as a promising biotechnological expression host.

Klatt S, Simpson L, Maslov D, Konthur Z PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(7):e0007424.

PMID: 31344033 PMC: 6657821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007424.


Unveiling the effects of berenil, a DNA-binding drug, on Trypanosoma cruzi: implications for kDNA ultrastructure and replication.

Zuma A, Cavalcanti D, Zogovich M, Machado A, Mendes I, Thiry M Parasitol Res. 2014; 114(2):419-30.

PMID: 25349143 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-4199-8.


Morphological events during the cell cycle of Leishmania major.

Ambit A, Woods K, Cull B, Coombs G, Mottram J Eukaryot Cell. 2011; 10(11):1429-38.

PMID: 21926331 PMC: 3209043. DOI: 10.1128/EC.05118-11.


The killing of African trypanosomes by ethidium bromide.

Chowdhury A, Bakshi R, Wang J, Yildirir G, Liu B, Pappas-Brown V PLoS Pathog. 2010; 6(12):e1001226.

PMID: 21187912 PMC: 3002999. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001226.


A high-order trans-membrane structural linkage is responsible for mitochondrial genome positioning and segregation by flagellar basal bodies in trypanosomes.

Ogbadoyi E, Robinson D, Gull K Mol Biol Cell. 2003; 14(5):1769-79.

PMID: 12802053 PMC: 165075. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e02-08-0525.


References
1.
Neubert D, Helge H, Bass R . [Incorporation of thymidine into deoxyribonucleic acid of mitochondria]. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1965; 252(3):258-68. View

2.
Parsons J . Mitochondrial incorporation of tritiated thymidine in Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Cell Biol. 1965; 25(3):641-6. PMC: 2106686. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.641. View

3.
Steinert M . [The absence of histone in the kinetonucleus of trypanosomes. Cytochemical study]. Exp Cell Res. 1965; 39(1):69-73. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90008-x. View

4.
SCHILDKRAUT C, MARMUR J, Doty P . Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J Mol Biol. 1962; 4:430-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80100-4. View

5.
Evans T . Synthesis of a cytoplasmic DNA during the G2 interphase of Physarum polycephalum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966; 22(6):678-83. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(66)90200-2. View