» Articles » PMID: 11884322

Breast Cancer on the World Wide Web: Cross Sectional Survey of Quality of Information and Popularity of Websites

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2002 Mar 9
PMID 11884322
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the characteristics of popular breast cancer related websites and whether more popular sites are of higher quality.

Design: The search engine Google was used to generate a list of websites about breast cancer. Google ranks search results by measures of link popularity---the number of links to a site from other sites. The top 200 sites returned in response to the query "breast cancer" were divided into "more popular" and "less popular" subgroups by three different measures of link popularity: Google rank and number of links reported independently by Google and by AltaVista (another search engine).

Main Outcome Measures: Type and quality of content.

Results: More popular sites according to Google rank were more likely than less popular ones to contain information on ongoing clinical trials (27% v 12%, P=0.01 ), results of trials (12% v 3%, P=0.02), and opportunities for psychosocial adjustment (48% v 23%, P<0.01). These characteristics were also associated with higher number of links as reported by Google and AltaVista. More popular sites by number of linking sites were also more likely to provide updates on other breast cancer research, information on legislation and advocacy, and a message board service. Measures of quality such as display of authorship, attribution or references, currency of information, and disclosure did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Popularity of websites is associated with type rather than quality of content. Sites that include content correlated with popularity may best meet the public's desire for information about breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?.

Gao B, Skalitzky M, Rund J, Shamrock A, Gulbrandsen T, Buckwalter J Iowa Orthop J. 2024; 44(1):47-58.

PMID: 38919356 PMC: 11195886.


Web-Based Information on Spinal Cord Stimulation: Qualitative Assessment of Publicly Accessible Online Resources.

Miller T, Hosseinzadeh A, Thordarson T, Kalimullina T, Samejima S, Shackleton C JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e50031.

PMID: 38393781 PMC: 10924266. DOI: 10.2196/50031.


An infodemiology study on exploring the quality and reliability of colorectal cancer immunotherapy information.

Mohamed H, OMalley L, Kelly D Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231205286.

PMID: 37808242 PMC: 10552482. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231205286.


Quality evaluation of health information about breast cancer treatment found on WeChat public accounts.

Yang W, Li B, Liu M, Tong D, Zou Y, Li X Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):170.

PMID: 37715269 PMC: 10503205. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01184-2.


Frequently asked questions about mobility devices among older adults.

Ferrell S, Ferrell M, Claassen A, Balogun S, Vassar M Eur Geriatr Med. 2023; 14(5):1075-1081.

PMID: 37505403 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00815-9.


References
1.
Price S, Hersh W . Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; :911-5. PMC: 2232852. View

2.
Shon J, Musen M . The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; :945-9. PMC: 2232512. View

3.
Hoffman-Goetz L, Clarke J . Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web. Can J Public Health. 2000; 91(4):281-4. PMC: 6979993. View

4.
OCONNOR J, Johanson J . Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA. 2000; 284(15):1962-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1962. View

5.
Sandvik H . Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence. BMJ. 1999; 319(7201):29-32. PMC: 28152. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.29. View