» Articles » PMID: 35877218

Quality of Online Information on Multiple Myeloma Available for Laypersons

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35877218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Online information can increase patients' competence and engagement. However, there are concerns regarding invalid information. Overall, 300 websites and 50 YouTube videos on multiple myeloma (MM) were evaluated. The websites did not differ between the search engines or search ranks. The median time since the last update was 9 months. The 63 unique websites showed a poor general quality (median JAMA score 2 of 4, only 18% with a valid HON certificate). The patient- (user-) focused quality was medium to poor (median sum DISCERN score 41 out of 80 points). The overall reading level was difficult requiring at least a 12th US school grade. The content level was low (median 24 out of 73 points). Sixteen percent contained misleading/wrong facts. Websites provided by foundation/advocacies showed a significantly higher general and patient- (user-) focused quality. For videos, the median time since upload was 18 months. Judged by the HON foundation score ~80% of videos showed a medium general quality. The patient- (user-) focused quality was medium to poor (median sum DISCERN score 43 points). The content level was very low (median 8 points). MM relevant websites and videos showed a medium to low general, patient- (user-) focused and content quality. Therefore, incorporation of quality indices and regular review is warranted.

Citing Articles

A web-based knowledge database to provide evidence-based information to cancer patients: Utilization within the PIKKO study.

Schneider N, Altmann U, Brandt F, Hubner J, Strauss B, Keinki C Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(8):521.

PMID: 39017937 PMC: 11254981. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08725-7.

References
1.
Kreutzer E, Sauer S, Kriegsmann M, Staemmler H, Egerer G, Kriegsmann K . Accuracy and Reliability of Internet Resources for Information on Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance-What Information Is out There for Our Patients?. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(18). PMC: 8465467. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184508. View

2.
Boyer C, Selby M, Appel R . The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health web sites. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999; 52 Pt 2:1163-6. View

3.
Reynolds M, Hoi A, Buchanan R . Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2018; 27(12):1911-1917. DOI: 10.1177/0961203318793213. View

4.
Berland G, Elliott M, Morales L, Algazy J, Kravitz R, Broder M . Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001; 285(20):2612-21. PMC: 4182102. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. View

5.
Iverson S, Howard K, Penney B . Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008; 108(12):699-711. View