» Articles » PMID: 11874386

Sex and Age Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Alosetron

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2002 Mar 5
PMID 11874386
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To determine the effects of sex and age on the pharmacokinetics of alosetron.

Methods: Single oral and intravenous 2 mg doses of alosetron were administered on separate occasions to 48 healthy, young and elderly, males and females. Serum was sampled for 12 h post-dose to measure alosetron concentrations.

Results: Serum concentrations of alosetron were higher in females than in males, resulting from a sex difference in clearance by metabolism. Mean clearance values were 504 vs 677 ml min(-1) in young females vs males (mean ratio 0.75), and 461 vs 670 ml min(-1) in elderly females vs males (mean ratio 0.69). The sex difference in alosetron pharmacokinetics achieved statistical significance in the elderly, but not in the young. Irrespective of sex, alosetron clearance was increased by smoking. Serum concentrations tended to be higher in the elderly, although the effect of age was generally not significant. Volume of distribution was smaller in females (approximately 63 l) compared with males (approximately 84 l), regardless of age or the sex difference in body weight.

Conclusions: A significant difference in clearance by metabolism of alosetron between the sexes, and possibly between the young and elderly was observed.

Citing Articles

Genetic hypogonadal (Gnrh1) mouse model uncovers influence of reproductive axis on maturation of the gut microbiome during puberty.

Sisk-Hackworth L, Akhavan S, Krutkin D, Kelley S, Thackray V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39005422 PMC: 11245025. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.01.601610.


Harnessing Clinical Trial and Real-World Data Towards an Understanding of Sex Effects on Drug Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy.

Oi Yan Chan J, Moullet M, Williamson B, Arends R, Pilla Reddy V Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:874606.

PMID: 35734405 PMC: 9207260. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.874606.


Sex-Bias in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Linking Steroids to the Gut-Brain Axis.

So S, Savidge T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:684096.

PMID: 34093447 PMC: 8170482. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.684096.


Population pharmacokinetics of ramosetron.

Lee S, Cho S, Yoo K, Jeong S J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015; 43(1):73-83.

PMID: 26558626 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-015-9455-8.


The clinical potential of ramosetron in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D).

Min Y, Rhee P Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2015; 8(3):136-42.

PMID: 25949526 PMC: 4416292. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X15572580.


References
1.
Camilleri M, Northcutt A, Kong S, Dukes G, McSorley D, Mangel A . Efficacy and safety of alosetron in women with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2000; 355(9209):1035-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02033-X. View

2.
Callaghan J, Bergstrom R, Ptak L, Beasley C . Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999; 37(3):177-93. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199937030-00001. View

3.
Watkins P, Murray S, Winkelman L, Heuman D, Wrighton S, Guzelian P . Erythromycin breath test as an assay of glucocorticoid-inducible liver cytochromes P-450. Studies in rats and patients. J Clin Invest. 1989; 83(2):688-97. PMC: 303730. DOI: 10.1172/JCI113933. View

4.
Sandler R . Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1990; 99(2):409-15. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91023-y. View

5.
Haring C, Fleischhacker W, Schett P, Humpel C, Barnas C, Saria A . Influence of patient-related variables on clozapine plasma levels. Am J Psychiatry. 1990; 147(11):1471-5. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.147.11.1471. View