Relation Between QT and RR Intervals is Highly Individual Among Healthy Subjects: Implications for Heart Rate Correction of the QT Interval

Overview

Journal Heart

Date 2002 Feb 16

PMID 11847158

Citations 122

Authors

M Malik

P Farbom

V Batchvarov

K Hnatkova

A J Camm

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the QT/RR relation in healthy subjects in order to investigate the differences in optimum heart rate correction of the QT interval.

Methods: 50 healthy volunteers (25 women, mean age 33.6 (9.5) years, range 19-59 years) took part. Each subject underwent serial 12 lead electrocardiographic monitoring over 24 hours with a 10 second ECG obtained every two minutes. QT intervals and heart rates were measured automatically. In each subject, the QT/RR relation was modelled using six generic regressions, including a linear model (QT = beta + alpha x RR), a hyperbolic model (QT = beta + alpha/RR), and a parabolic model (QT = beta x RR(alpha)). For each model, the parallelism and identity of the regression lines in separate subjects were statistically tested.

Results: The patterns of the QT/RR relation were very different among subjects. Regardless of the generic form of the regression model, highly significant differences were found not only between the regression lines but also between their slopes. For instance, with the linear model, the individual slope (parameter alpha) of any subject differed highly significantly (p < 0.000001) from the linear slope of no fewer than 21 (median 32) other subjects. The linear regression line of 20 subjects differed significantly (p < 0.000001) from the linear regression lines of each other subject. Conversion of the QT/RR regressions to QTc heart rate correction also showed substantial intersubject differences. Optimisation of the formula QTc = QT/RR(alpha) led to individual values of alpha ranging from 0.234 to 0.486.

Conclusion: The QT/RR relation exhibits a very substantial intersubject variability in healthy volunteers. The hypothesis underlying each prospective heart rate correction formula that a "physiological" QT/RR relation exists that can be mathematically described and applied to all people is incorrect. Any general heart rate correction formula can be used only for very approximate clinical assessment of the QTc interval over a narrow window of resting heart rates. For detailed precise studies of the QTc interval (for example, drug induced QT interval prolongation), the individual QT/RR relation has to be taken into account.

Citing Articles

Tracking changes in autonomic function by coupled analysis of wavelet-based dispersion of heart rate variability and gastrointestinal symptom severity in individuals with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Mathena S, Allen R, Laukaitis C, Andrews J Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1499582.

PMID: 39882368 PMC: 11778341. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1499582.

Association between QT prolongation and cardiovascular mortality in cancer patients.

Chan C, Liu C, Chen P, Liao L, Wu I, Hu Y Cardiooncology. 2024; 10(1):69.

PMID: 39396042 PMC: 11470720. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-024-00271-9.

Comparison of corrected QT (QTc) interval of electrocardiogram calculated from various formulas.

Mondal H, Mondal S, Priyadarshini B Indian Heart J. 2024; 76(4):303-305.

PMID: 39009079 PMC: 11451423. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.07.006.

Predictors for prolonged qt intervals in acute antipsychotic poisoned patients.

Khalifa H, Mostafa Mansour N, Elmansy A Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024; 13(2):tfae038.

PMID: 38500514 PMC: 10944555. DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfae038.

Morphological Changes of Anomalous Coronary Arteries From the Aorta During the Cardiac Cycle Assessed by IVUS in Resting Conditions.

Formato G, Agnifili M, Arzuffi L, Rosato A, Ceserani V, Zuniga Olaya K Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16(7):e012636.

PMID: 37417226 PMC: 10348625. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012636.

References

Noble D, Tsien R . Outward membrane currents activated in the plateau range of potentials in cardiac Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1969; 200(1):205-31. PMC: 1350425. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008689. View

Gang Y, Guo X, Crook R, Hnatkova K, Camm A, Malik M . Computerised measurements of QT dispersion in healthy subjects. Heart. 1999; 80(5):459-66. PMC: 1728844. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.5.459. View

SIMONSON E, CADY Jr L, Woodbury M . The normal Q-T interval. Am Heart J. 1962; 63:747-53. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(62)90059-5. View

Priori S, Napolitano C, Schwartz P . Low penetrance in the long-QT syndrome: clinical impact. Circulation. 1999; 99(4):529-33. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.4.529. View

Sagie A, Larson M, Goldberg R, Bengtson J, Levy D . An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70(7):797-801. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90562-d. View

Rautaharju P, Zhou S, Wong S, Calhoun H, Berenson G, Prineas R . Sex differences in the evolution of the electrocardiographic QT interval with age. Can J Cardiol. 1992; 8(7):690-5. View

Morganroth J, Brown A, Critz S, Crumb W, Kunze D, Lacerda A . Variability of the QTc interval: impact on defining drug effect and low-frequency cardiac event. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72(6):26B-31B. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90037-d. View

Wohlfart B, Pahlm O . Normal values for QT intervals in ECG during ramp exercise on bicycle. Clin Physiol. 1994; 14(4):371-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1994.tb00395.x. View

Yoshinaga M, Tomari T, Aihoshi S, Kawashita T, Nishi J, Tanaka Y . Exponential correction of QT interval to minimize the effect of the heart rate in children. Jpn Circ J. 1993; 57(2):102-8. DOI: 10.1253/jcj.57.102. View

10.

Molnar J, Weiss J, Zhang F, Rosenthal J . Evaluation of five QT correction formulas using a software-assisted method of continuous QT measurement from 24-hour Holter recordings. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78(8):920-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00468-7. View

11.

Funck-Brentano C, Jaillon P . Rate-corrected QT interval: techniques and limitations. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72(6):17B-22B. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90035-b. View

12.

LJUNG O . A simple formula for clinical interpretation of the QT interval. Acta Med Scand. 1949; 134(2):79-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1949.tb03451.x. View

13.

Boudoulas H, Geleris P, Lewis R, Rittgers S . Linear relationship between electrical systole, mechanical systole, and heart rate. Chest. 1981; 80(5):613-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.80.5.613. View

14.

MOSS A . Measurement of the QT interval and the risk associated with QTc interval prolongation: a review. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72(6):23B-25B. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90036-c. View

15.

Rickards A, Norman J . Relation between QT interval and heart rate. New design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J. 1981; 45(1):56-61. PMC: 482489. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.45.1.56. View

16.

Extramiana F, Neyroud N, Huikuri H, Koistinen M, COUMEL P, Maison-Blanche P . QT interval and arrhythmic risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83(2):266-9, A6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00835-2. View

17.

Batchvarov V, Yi G, Guo X, Savelieva I, Camm A, Malik M . QT interval and QT dispersion measured with the threshold method depend on threshold level. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998; 21(11 Pt 2):2372-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01184.x. View

18.

Lecocq B, Lecocq V, Jaillon P . Physiologic relation between cardiac cycle and QT duration in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64(8):481-6. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90425-6. View

19.

Roden D . Taking the "idio" out of "idiosyncratic": predicting torsades de pointes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998; 21(5):1029-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00148.x. View

20.

Liu D, Antzelevitch C . Characteristics of the delayed rectifier current (IKr and IKs) in canine ventricular epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes. A weaker IKs contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell. Circ Res. 1995; 76(3):351-65. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.76.3.351. View