» Articles » PMID: 11825180

Cross-tool Communication: from Protocol Authoring to Eligibility Determination

Overview
Journal Proc AMIA Symp
Date 2002 Feb 5
PMID 11825180
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To be effective, informatics tools for clinical trial protocols must inter-operate and share knowledge. We demonstrate a simple XML-based communication of eligibility criteria information between two independently-developed informatics tools. Using a shared DTD model of criteria, an authoring tool (developed within the Protégé environment) can send a list of eligibility criteria to a commercial system for automatic eligibility determination (the "iKnowChart" system by iKnowMed). The criteria model, developed as a Protégé ontology, includes both the terminology and the logic needed to compute eligibility for a given patient. As a demonstration of cross-tool communication, we have encoded criteria from an active clinical trial protocol (E1199), and shown how use of the authoring tool can effectively update the eligibility knowledge and the behavior of the commercial iKnowChart system. As part of the cross-tool knowledge sharing, we use Common Data Elements, an oncology terminology developed by the National Cancer Institute.

Citing Articles

Cross border semantic interoperability for learning health systems: The EHR4CR semantic resources and services.

Daniel C, Ouagne D, Sadou E, Paris N, Hussain S, Jaulent M Learn Health Syst. 2019; 1(1):e10014.

PMID: 31245551 PMC: 6516724. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10014.


Trend and Network Analysis of Common Eligibility Features for Cancer Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Weng C, Yaman A, Lin K, He Z Smart Health. 2016; 8549:130-141.

PMID: 26998530 PMC: 4795902. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08416-9_13.


Trial prospector: matching patients with cancer research studies using an automated and scalable approach.

Sahoo S, Tao S, Parchman A, Luo Z, Cui L, Mergler P Cancer Inform. 2014; 13:157-66.

PMID: 25506198 PMC: 4259509. DOI: 10.4137/CIN.S19454.


Eligibility determination for clinical trials: development of a case review process at a chiropractic research center.

Vining R, Salsbury S, Pohlman K Trials. 2014; 15:406.

PMID: 25344427 PMC: 4221721. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-406.


Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts.

Hao T, Weng C Methods Inf Med. 2014; 54(2):164-70.

PMID: 25327613 PMC: 4441820. DOI: 10.3414/ME13-01-0130.


References
1.
Rubin D, Gennari J, Srinivas S, Yuen A, Kaizer H, Musen M . Tool support for authoring eligibility criteria for cancer trials. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; :369-73. PMC: 2232521. View

2.
Sim I, Owens D, Lavori P, Rennels G . Electronic trial banks: a complementary method for reporting randomized trials. Med Decis Making. 2000; 20(4):440-50. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000408. View

3.
Peleg M, Boxwala A, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu S, Lacson R . GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; :645-9. PMC: 2243832. View

4.
Ohno-Machado L, Gennari J, Murphy S, Jain N, Tu S, OLIVER D . The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(4):357-72. PMC: 61313. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050357. View

5.
Tu S, Kemper C, Lane N, Carlson R, Musen M . A methodology for determining patients' eligibility for clinical trials. Methods Inf Med. 1993; 32(4):317-25. View