» Articles » PMID: 1180766

[Bone Stress and Reconstruction of the Bone at the Alloarthroplasty of the Upper End of the Femur with Cement Bonding (author's Transl)]

Overview
Date 1975 Sep 4
PMID 1180766
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Structure and shape of the upper end of the femur are determined by direction and height according to their strain. Forces which flow from pelvis into femoral head have at first an unfavourable direction that means a non-axial direction of the femoral shaft. The mechanic task of the proximal femur (epi- and metaphysis) is to divert the forces in a way that they disperse in axial direction to the shaft (tension and pressure forces of the upper end of the femur). By replacement of the endoprosthesis, the epiphysis and a large part of the metaphysis is removed and will be replaced by metal- or bone cement. This leads to a thorough change of the mechanical stress. According to Wolff's transformation law the bone tends to adopt the changes stress throught reconstructing processes. Static and morphologic researches of the normal and endoprosthetic femur could demonstrate a conformity of bone reconstruction and changed bone stress. The spongiosa remaining after resection is not sufficient to distribute the influenced forces of the shaft of the bone. Result is a cancellous bone of the upper end of the shaft. We call this reaction "Metaphysierung". According to the unphysiologic high bending stress of the shaft in level of the lower half of the haft of the prosthesis, a hypertrophy of cortex and vault occurs. The large stress of this part of the bone can be the cause of non-infectious late loosenings of the prosthesis.

Citing Articles

Changes in bone density, intraosseous pressure of distal femoral articular cartilage and subchondral bone after proximal femoral medullary cavity cement filling in rabbits.

Le G, Xi L, Zhang M, Zhao J Exp Ther Med. 2021; 22(2):839.

PMID: 34149885 PMC: 8210259. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10271.


Aseptic loosening of cement-anchored total hip replacements.

Aldinger G, Gekeler J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1982; 100(1):19-25.

PMID: 7125870 DOI: 10.1007/BF00381538.


Results of alloarthroplasty of the hip joint.

Oberthaler W, Bauer R, Sattler K Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1980; 96(4):247-58.

PMID: 6994678 DOI: 10.1007/BF00432862.


Stresses and functional adaptation of alloarthroplasty of the proximal femur in dogs using a selfcuring rippled prosthesis. A comparative biomechanical and morphological study (author's transl).

Diehl K, Harms J Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1976; 84(1):89-104.

PMID: 1267673


[Evaluation of loosening of different total hip models and neck lengths (author's transl)].

Tonnis D, Asai H Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1976; 86(3):317-32.

PMID: 1008730 DOI: 10.1007/BF00418908.


References
1.
Kolbel R, Boenick U, KRIEGER W, Wilk R . [Mechanical properties of bonding between cancellous bone and polymethylmethacrylate. II. Shear strength (author's transl)]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1973; 77(4):339-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF00418919. View

2.
HENRICHSEN E, Jansen K, KROUGH-POULSEN W . Experimental investigation of the tissue reaction to acrylic plastics. Acta Orthop Scand. 1952; 22(2):141-6. DOI: 10.3109/17453675208989001. View

3.
ENDLER F . [The general experimental properties of methyl-methacrylate endoprosthesis for hip and their importance for the late prognosis of an artificial hip arthroplasty]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1953; 46(1):35-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF00415921. View

4.
Seyfarth H . [Problem of implantation of foreign bodies]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1956; 48(3):254-69. DOI: 10.1007/BF00415959. View

5.
Grunert A, Ritter G . [Experimental investigations to the problem of anchorage of the hip joint endoprostheses (author's transl)]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1973; 77(2):149-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF00416447. View