Determination of Renal Arterial Stenosis Severity: Comparison of Pressure Gradient and Vessel Diameter
Affiliations
Purpose: To determine the hemodynamic significance of arteriographically detected renal arterial stenosis by obtaining pressure gradients with a miniaturized pressure guide wire.
Materials And Methods: Forty-six renal arterial stenoses in 38 patients were assessed in terms of severity and then subjected to gradient determination before and after angioplasty. The patients (mean age, 63 years) had a mean serum creatinine value of 1.3 mg/dL +/- 0.4 (114.9 micromol/L +/- 35.4 [SD]) and required on average three medications for blood pressure control. The mean degree of stenosis diameter was 51% +/- 17 (range, 12%-85%).
Results: The systolic and mean arterial pressure gradients with and those without vasodilatation were highly correlated with stenosis severity, systolic blood pressure, and serum creatinine as a curvilinear fit (r = 0.9, P <.01). At 50% stenosis severity, the mean pressure gradient was 22 mm Hg.
Conclusion: Patients with a pressure gradient greater than 20 mm Hg should be good candidates for renal arterial dilatation, and use of the pressure guide wire will facilitate interventional decisions.
Chang Y, Li Y, Duan X, Lv N, Meng Y, Zhou F Hypertens Res. 2024; 48(2):702-709.
PMID: 39433968 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01948-5.
Can low-grade renal artery stenosis be considered as cause for renovascular hypertension?.
Woittiez A, de Vogel M, de Leeuw P J Hum Hypertens. 2021; 36(4):420-422.
PMID: 34697407 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00628-y.
Ren J, Ma N, Wang S, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Guo F Chin Med J (Engl). 2019; 132(1):63-68.
PMID: 30628960 PMC: 6629313. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000002.
Onoue Y, Tsujita K, Hokimoto S, Kaikita K, Sugiyama S, Ogawa H J Cardiol Cases. 2018; 4(3):e163-e167.
PMID: 30532886 PMC: 6265432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2011.08.006.
New onset hypertension-rare intimal variant fibromuscular dysplasia.
Kalavakunta J, Tokala H, Gupta V J Cardiol Cases. 2018; 4(1):e50-e54.
PMID: 30532869 PMC: 6265136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2011.04.005.