» Articles » PMID: 11470903

Reproductive Aging and Mating: the Ticking of the Biological Clock in Female Cockroaches

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2001 Jul 27
PMID 11470903
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Females are expected to have different mating preferences because of the variation in costs and benefits of mate choice both between females and within individual females over a lifetime. Workers have begun to look for, and find, the expected variation among females in expressed mating preferences. However, variation within females caused by changes in intrinsic influences has not been examined in detail. Here we show that reproductive aging caused by delayed mating resulted in reduced choosiness by female Nauphoeta cinerea, a cockroach that has reproductive cycles and gives live birth. Male willingness to mate was unaffected by variation in female age. Females who were beyond the optimal mating age, 6 days postadult molt, required considerably less courtship than their younger counterparts. Females who were older when they mated had fewer offspring per clutch and fewer clutches than females who mated young. Thus, reduced choosiness was correlated with a permanent reduction in fertility. There was no difference in overall senescence among females, and thus the reduction in clutch size did not result in the expected increased lifespan. We suggest that reproductive aging in N. cinerea, similar to aging in general, occurs because the maintenance of oocytes is costly, and selection is relaxed after the optimal mating period. Our results further suggest that selection for continued choosiness is also relaxed and supports direct selection on female choosiness and a cost to choosiness.

Citing Articles

Genetic variation in age-dependent attractiveness in a fish with a mixed mating system.

Guerra J, Newton M, Nicotera C, McGhee K Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240448.

PMID: 39838734 PMC: 11751635. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0448.


The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour.

Woodman J, Gokcekus S, Beck K, Green J, Nussey D, Firth J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1916):20220464.

PMID: 39463244 PMC: 11513650. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0464.


Seasonal shift in diet affects female reproductive anatomy but not mating behavior.

Cirino L Oecologia. 2023; 202(2):397-411.

PMID: 37354252 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05398-7.


Flexibility of neural circuits regulating mating behaviors in mice and flies.

Karigo T, Deutsch D Front Neural Circuits. 2022; 16:949781.

PMID: 36426135 PMC: 9679785. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.949781.


Fitness costs of female choosiness are low in a socially monogamous songbird.

Forstmeier W, Wang D, Martin K, Kempenaers B PLoS Biol. 2021; 19(11):e3001257.

PMID: 34735432 PMC: 8568113. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001257.


References
1.
Fitzgerald C, Zimon A, Jones E . Aging and reproductive potential in women. Yale J Biol Med. 1999; 71(5):367-81. PMC: 2578931. View

2.
Jang Y, Greenfield M . Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. Heredity (Edinb). 2000; 84 ( Pt 1):73-80. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00631.x. View

3.
Ritchie M . The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1441):327-32. PMC: 1690534. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1004. View

4.
Shaw K, Herlihy D . Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1443):577-84. PMC: 1690564. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1040. View

5.
Murphy C, Gerhardt H . Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls. Evolution. 2000; 54(2):660-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00067.x. View