» Articles » PMID: 11470871

Bulged Residues Promote the Progression of a Loop-loop Interaction to a Stable and Inhibitory Antisense-target RNA Complex

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2001 Jul 27
PMID 11470871
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA-CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop-loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop-loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop-loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.

Citing Articles

Using in-cell SHAPE-Seq and simulations to probe structure-function design principles of RNA transcriptional regulators.

Takahashi M, Watters K, Gasper P, Abbott T, Carlson P, Chen A RNA. 2016; 22(6):920-33.

PMID: 27103533 PMC: 4878617. DOI: 10.1261/rna.054916.115.


Structure and stability of RNA/RNA kissing complex: with application to HIV dimerization initiation signal.

Cao S, Chen S RNA. 2011; 17(12):2130-43.

PMID: 22028361 PMC: 3222126. DOI: 10.1261/rna.026658.111.


The PETfold and PETcofold web servers for intra- and intermolecular structures of multiple RNA sequences.

Seemann S, Menzel P, Backofen R, Gorodkin J Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(Web Server issue):W107-11.

PMID: 21609960 PMC: 3125731. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr248.


Artificial trans-encoded small non-coding RNAs specifically silence the selected gene expression in bacteria.

Man S, Cheng R, Miao C, Gong Q, Gu Y, Lu X Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(8):e50.

PMID: 21296758 PMC: 3082891. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr034.


Bacterial antisense RNAs: how many are there, and what are they doing?.

Thomason M, Storz G Annu Rev Genet. 2010; 44:167-88.

PMID: 20707673 PMC: 3030471. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163523.


References
1.
Massire C, Westhof E . MANIP: an interactive tool for modelling RNA. J Mol Graph Model. 1999; 16(4-6):197-205, 255-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(98)80004-1. View

2.
Jossinet F, Paillart J, Westhof E, Hermann T, Skripkin E, Lodmell J . Dimerization of HIV-1 genomic RNA of subtypes A and B: RNA loop structure and magnesium binding. RNA. 1999; 5(9):1222-34. PMC: 1369845. DOI: 10.1017/s1355838299990982. View

3.
Siemering K, Praszkier J, Pittard A . Interaction between the antisense and target RNAs involved in the regulation of IncB plasmid replication. J Bacteriol. 1993; 175(10):2895-906. PMC: 204607. DOI: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2895-2906.1993. View

4.
Persson C, WAGNER E, Nordstrom K . Control of replication of plasmid R1: formation of an initial transient complex is rate-limiting for antisense RNA--target RNA pairing. EMBO J. 1990; 9(11):3777-85. PMC: 552136. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07591.x. View

5.
WAGNER E, Blomberg P, Nordstrom K . Replication control in plasmid R1: duplex formation between the antisense RNA, CopA, and its target, CopT, is not required for inhibition of RepA synthesis. EMBO J. 1992; 11(3):1195-203. PMC: 556562. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05160.x. View