» Articles » PMID: 11467524

Proteolytic 18O Labeling for Comparative Proteomics: Model Studies with Two Serotypes of Adenovirus

Overview
Journal Anal Chem
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2001 Jul 27
PMID 11467524
Citations 176
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A new method for proteolytic stable isotope labeling is introduced to provide quantitative and concurrent comparisons between individual proteins from two entire proteome pools or their subfractions. Two 18O atoms are incorporated universally into the carboxyl termini of all tryptic peptides during the proteolytic cleavage of all proteins in the first pool. Proteins in the second pool are cleaved analogously with the carboxyl termini of the resulting peptides containing two 16O atoms (i.e., no labeling). The two peptide mixtures are pooled for fractionation and separation, and the masses and isotope ratios of each peptide pair (differing by 4 Da) are measured by high-resolution mass spectrometry. Short sequences and/or accurate mass measurements combined with proteomics software tools allow the peptides to be related to the precursor proteins from which they are derived. Relative signal intensities of paired peptides quantify the expression levels of their precursor proteins from proteome pools to be compared, using an equation described in the paper. Observation of individual (unpaired) peptides is mainly interpreted as differential modification or sequence variation for the protein from the respective proteome pool. The method is evaluated here in a comparison of virion proteins for two serotypes (Ad5 and Ad2) of adenovirus, taking advantage of information already available about protein sequences and concentrations. In general, proteolytic 18O labeling enables a shotgun approach for proteomic studies with quantitation capability and is proposed as a useful tool for comparative proteomic studies of very complex protein mixtures.

Citing Articles

Identification of Proteomic Biomarkers of Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using Stable Isotope Labeling.

Yu L, Gao Y, Beger R Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2823:225-239.

PMID: 39052223 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3922-1_14.


Reverse-ChIP Techniques for Identifying Locus-Specific Proteomes: A Key Tool in Unlocking the Cancer Regulome.

MacKenzie T, Cisneros R, Maynard R, Snyder M Cells. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37508524 PMC: 10377898. DOI: 10.3390/cells12141860.


Peptidomics.

Hellinger R, Sigurdsson A, Wu W, Romanova E, Li L, Sweedler J Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2023; 3.

PMID: 37250919 PMC: 7614574. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00205-2.


DeGlyPHER: Highly sensitive site-specific analysis of N-linked glycans on proteins.

Baboo S, Diedrich J, Martinez-Bartolome S, Wang X, Schiffner T, Groschel B Methods Enzymol. 2023; 682:137-185.

PMID: 36948700 PMC: 11032187. DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.09.004.


Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Workflows in Cancer Research: The Relevance of Choosing the Right Steps.

Carrillo-Rodriguez P, Selheim F, Hernandez-Valladares M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672506 PMC: 9856946. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020555.