» Articles » PMID: 11331746

Proteomic Dissection of Dome Formation in a Mammary Cell Line: Role of Tropomyosin-5b and Maspin

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2001 May 2
PMID 11331746
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this work we extended the study of genes controlling the formation of specific differentiation structures called "domes" formed by the rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell line LA7 under the influence of DMSO. We have reported previously that an interferon-inducible gene, rat-8, and the beta-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) play a fundamental role in this process. Now, we used a proteomic approach to identify proteins differentially expressed either in DMSO-induced LA7 or in 106A10 cells. Two differentially expressed proteins were investigated. The first, tropomyosin-5b, strongly expressed in DMSO-induced LA7 cells, is needed for dome formation because its synthesis inhibition by the antisense RNA technology abolished domes. The second protein, maspin, strongly expressed in the uninduced 106A10 cell line, inhibits dome formation because 106A10 cells, transfected with rat8 cDNA (the function of which is required for the organization of these structures), acquired the ability to develop domes when cultured in presence of an antimaspin antibody. Dome formation in these cultures are accompanied by ENaC beta-subunit expression in the absence of DMSO. Therefore, dome formation requires the expression of tropomyosin-5b, in addition to the ENaC beta-subunit and the rat8 proteins, and is under the negative control of maspin.

Citing Articles

Transmembrane Protein TMEM230, Regulator of Glial Cell Vascular Mimicry and Endothelial Cell Angiogenesis in High-Grade Heterogeneous Infiltrating Gliomas and Glioblastoma.

Cocola C, Abeni E, Martino V, Piscitelli E, Pelucchi P, Mosca E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612777 PMC: 11011566. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073967.


Effect of luminal flow on doming of mpkCCD cells in a 3D perfusable kidney cortical collecting duct model.

Rein J, Heja S, Flores D, Carrisoza-Gaytan R, Lin N, Homan K Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020; 319(1):C136-C147.

PMID: 32401606 PMC: 7468887. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00405.2019.


Actin-tropomyosin distribution in non-muscle cells.

Manstein D, Meiring J, Hardeman E, Gunning P J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2019; 41(1):11-22.

PMID: 31054005 PMC: 7109190. DOI: 10.1007/s10974-019-09514-0.


Aquaporin 5 expression in mouse mammary gland cells is not driven by promoter methylation.

Arbeithuber B, Thuenauer R, Gravogl Y, Balogi Z, Romer W, Sonnleitner A Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:460598.

PMID: 25767807 PMC: 4342075. DOI: 10.1155/2015/460598.


Characterization of the osteoblast-specific transmembrane protein IFITM5 and analysis of IFITM5-deficient mice.

Hanagata N, Li X, Morita H, Takemura T, Li J, Minowa T J Bone Miner Metab. 2010; 29(3):279-90.

PMID: 20838829 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-010-0221-0.


References
1.
Seftor R, Seftor E, Sheng S, PEMBERTON P, Sager R, Hendrix M . maspin suppresses the invasive phenotype of human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1998; 58(24):5681-5. View

2.
Zhang M, Magit D, Botteri F, Shi H, He K, Li M . Maspin plays an important role in mammary gland development. Dev Biol. 1999; 215(2):278-87. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9442. View

3.
DULBECCO R, Okada S . Differentiation and morphogenesis of mammary cells in vitro. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980; 208(1173):399-408. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1980.0058. View

4.
Gygi S, Rochon Y, Franza B, Aebersold R . Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19(3):1720-30. PMC: 83965. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.3.1720. View

5.
Hendrix M . De-mystifying the mechanism(s) of maspin. Nat Med. 2000; 6(4):374-6. DOI: 10.1038/74624. View