» Articles » PMID: 11303999

Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2001 Apr 17
PMID 11303999
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tables cannot be adjusted adequately to allow surgeons of different stature to maintain a comfortable posture. The goal of this study was to establish the most ergonomic table height for the particular physique of the surgeon and the different types of laparoscopic instrument handles that he or she uses.

Methods: In a simulated model, two probands of different stature (50th [BS 50] and 95th [BS 95] percentile) used laparoscopic instruments with four different handle designs (shank, pistol, axial, and rod). The instruments were inserted into a board in three different angles ([IA] = 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 40 degrees). Additionally the elbow angles (EA) of the volunteers were fixed to either 90 degrees or 120 degrees. For every variable (size of surgeon and his or her elbow angle, design of handle, insertion angle of the instrument) the height of the board, as a parameter for the level of the abdominal wall of a patient with pneumoperitioneum, was measured from the floor.

Results: All parameters had an effect on the optimal operating table height. The lowest required operating table level was 30 cm, the highest was 60.5 cm. In laparoscopic surgery-long shafted instruments and patients with pneumoperitoneum-the tabletops are too high for over 95% of all surgeons. As skin incision and wound suture are performed the conventional way, the operating tabletop must be adjustable up to the common height of 122 cm. The maximal difference between the optimal heights of the OR-table for one volunteer using two different handles with different insertion angles of the instruments (BS 95, EA 90 degrees, IA 20 degrees, rod handle to BS 50, EA 120 degrees, IA 40 degrees, axial handle) was about 27 cm.

Conclusion: New operating tables with a much lower adjustability are necessary to fulfill ergonomic requirements. The use of differently designed handles can hinder the ergonomic posture of the surgeon, because each handle requires a different working height.

Citing Articles

Impact of sex on ergonomic challenges in cardiothoracic surgery: Inequities in work-related injuries.

Piyadeoglu D, Papageorge M, Lee R, Antonoff M JTCVS Open. 2025; 23:214-221.

PMID: 40061563 PMC: 11883705. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.015.


Colorectal surgeon physical pain and conditioning: a national survey.

Johnson G, Roy H, Webber S, Shariff F, Helewa R, Hochman D Can J Surg. 2025; 68(1):E64-E70.

PMID: 39915061 PMC: 11818781. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.007724.


Development and clinical validation of passive shoulder exoskeleton with novel gravity compensation mechanism for stabilizing arm tremor of surgeons during minimally invasive surgery.

Choi H, Lee S, In H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1418148.

PMID: 39737054 PMC: 11683106. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1418148.


The effects of operating height and the passage of time on the end-point performance of fine manipulative tasks that require high accuracy.

Choi H, In H Front Physiol. 2022; 13:944866.

PMID: 36051911 PMC: 9424850. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.944866.


Ergonomics in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society.

Mattogno P, Marciano F, Catalino M, Mattavelli D, Cocca P, Lopomo N J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022; 83(Suppl 2):e380-e385.

PMID: 35832944 PMC: 9272277. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729906.


References
1.
Matern U, Waller P . Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(2):174-82. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900934. View

2.
Kano N, Yamakawa T, Ishikawa Y, Miyajima N, OHTAKI S, Kasugai H . Prevention of laparoscopic surgeon's thumb. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(6):738-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00187955. View

3.
Mueller L . Laparoscopic instrument grips. An ergonomic approach. Surg Endosc. 1993; 7(5):465-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00311747. View

4.
Berguer R . Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(5):458-62. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900705. View

5.
van der Zee D, Bax N . Digital nerve compression due to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(6):740. DOI: 10.1007/BF00187956. View