Impact of Sex on Ergonomic Challenges in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Inequities in Work-related Injuries

Overview

Journal JTCVS Open

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2025 Mar 10

PMID 40061563

Authors

Deniz Piyadeoglu

Marianna Papageorge

Rachel M Lee

Mara B Antonoff

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Ergonomic challenges resulting in work-related injuries are highly prevalent, and women surgeons encounter more ergonomic difficulties and resultant injuries than men. Cardiothoracic (CT) surgery requires intense physical demands, and it is unknown how surgeon's sex may impact these challenges. Therefore, we sought to explore the impact of sex on ergonomic-related issues faced by CT surgeons.

Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was designed and administered via a web-based platform from April 9, 2024, to April 25, 2024. Survey items addressed demographic and anthropometric data, ergonomic difficulties, pain symptoms, and associated treatments related to ergonomics in the operating room. Comparative analytics were performed between the sexes.

Results: Fifty-one participants completed the survey, including 29 practicing CT surgeons (56.9%) and 22 trainees (43.1%). The respondents included 21 women (41.2%). There was no difference in mean age by sex (40.5 years vs 40.7 years; = .94). Women were shorter (65.3 inches vs 70.6 inches; < .01) and had smaller hands (glove size, 6.2 vs 7.4; < .01). Eighteen women (85.7%) reported pain compared to 20 men (66.7%; = .23) Women more often reported an impact on daily life (83.3% [n = 15] vs 50.0% [n = 10]; = .06). Women frequently reported needing treatment (61.1%) and time off work due to injury (27.7%). Notably, 76.2% of women (n = 16) attributed their discomfort to instruments and/or operating room setup, compared to 36.7% of men (n = 11; = .01).

Conclusions: The impact of work-related pain on CT surgeons is substantial, with evidence of sex differences in rates and severity. Emphasis must be placed on limiting injuries for all while specifically supporting the anthropometric diversity of our future workforce.

References

Voss R, Chiang Y, Cromwell K, Urbauer D, Lee J, Cormier J . Do No Harm, Except to Ourselves? A Survey of Symptoms and Injuries in Oncologic Surgeons and Pilot Study of an Intraoperative Ergonomic Intervention. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 224(1):16-25.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.09.013. View

Dairywala M, Gupta S, Salna M, Nguyen T . Surgeon Strength: Ergonomics and Strength Training in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 34(4):1220-1229. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.09.015. View

Mathey-Andrews C, Venkateswaran S, McCarthy M, Potter A, Copeland J, Panda N . A national survey of occupational musculoskeletal injuries in cardiothoracic surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 168(2):617-625.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.038. View

Berguer R, Hreljac A . The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(3):508-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8824-3. View

Epstein S, Sparer E, Tran B, Ruan Q, Dennerlein J, Singhal D . Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017; 153(2):e174947. PMC: 5838584. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4947. View

Sutton E, Irvin M, Zeigler C, Lee G, Park A . The ergonomics of women in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013; 28(4):1051-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3281-0. View

Soueid A, Oudit D, Thiagarajah S, Laitung G . The pain of surgery: pain experienced by surgeons while operating. Int J Surg. 2009; 8(2):118-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.008. View

Davis W, Fletcher S, Guillamondegui O . Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions. J Surg Res. 2014; 189(2):207-212.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.013. View

Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Ruckauer K, Farthmann E . Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables. JSLS. 2001; 5(1):7-12. PMC: 3015407. View

10.

Uhrich M, Underwood R, Standeven J, Soper N, Engsberg J . Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(4):635-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8151-5. View

11.

Park A, Lee G, Seagull F, Meenaghan N, Dexter D . Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(3):306-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.017. View

12.

Venkateswaran S, Wang D, Potter A, Yang C . Safety and Optimizing Ergonomics for Cardiothoracic Surgeons. Thorac Surg Clin. 2024; 34(3):197-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2024.04.007. View

13.

Wong J, Moore K, Carey E . Investigation of the Association between Surgeon Sex and Laparoscopic Device Ergonomic Strain in Gynecologic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022; 29(8):984-991. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.04.019. View

14.

Tran M, Kortz M, Johnson B, Janis J . Operation-related Musculoskeletal Injuries among United States Surgeons: A Gender-stratified National Survey. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(2):e4142. PMC: 8856129. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004142. View

15.

Adams D, Fenton S, Schirmer B, Mahvi D, Horvath K, Nichol P . One size does not fit all: current disposable laparoscopic devices do not fit the needs of female laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(10):2310-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9986-9. View