» Articles » PMID: 11290705

Efficient Incorporation of Large (>2 Kb) Heterologies into Heteroduplex DNA: Pms1/Msh2-dependent and -independent Large Loop Mismatch Repair in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2001 Apr 6
PMID 11290705
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in yeast is effected primarily by gene conversion. Conversion can conceivably result from gap repair or from mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) in recombination intermediates. Mismatch repair is normally very efficient, but unrepaired mismatches segregate in the next cell division, producing sectored colonies. Conversion of small heterologies (single-base differences or insertions <15 bp) in meiosis and mitosis involves mismatch repair of hDNA. The repair of larger loop mismatches in plasmid substrates or arising by replication slippage is inefficient and/or independent of Pms1p/Msh2p-dependent mismatch repair. However, large insertions convert readily (without sectoring) during meiotic recombination, raising the question of whether large insertions convert by repair of large loop mismatches or by gap repair. We show that insertions of 2.2 and 2.6 kbp convert efficiently during DSB-induced mitotic recombination, primarily by Msh2p- and Pms1p-dependent repair of large loop mismatches. These results support models in which Rad51p readily incorporates large heterologies into hDNA. We also show that large heterologies convert more frequently than small heterologies located the same distance from an initiating DSB and propose that this reflects Msh2-independent large loop-specific mismatch repair biased toward loop loss.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting template switch recombination associated with restarted DNA replication.

Jalan M, Oehler J, Morrow C, Osman F, Whitby M Elife. 2019; 8.

PMID: 30667359 PMC: 6358216. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.41697.


Sgs1 and Exo1 suppress targeted chromosome duplication during ends-in and ends-out gene targeting.

Stafa A, Miklenic M, Zunar B, Lisnic B, Symington L, Svetec I DNA Repair (Amst). 2014; 22:12-23.

PMID: 25089886 PMC: 4175061. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.07.004.


Friedreich's ataxia (GAA)n•(TTC)n repeats strongly stimulate mitotic crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisae.

Tang W, Dominska M, Greenwell P, Harvanek Z, Lobachev K, Kim H PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(1):e1001270.

PMID: 21249181 PMC: 3020933. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001270.


A fine-structure map of spontaneous mitotic crossovers in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Lee P, Greenwell P, Dominska M, Gawel M, Hamilton M, Petes T PLoS Genet. 2009; 5(3):e1000410.

PMID: 19282969 PMC: 2646836. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000410.


Partial reconstitution of DNA large loop repair with purified proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Sommer D, Stith C, Burgers P, Lahue R Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(14):4699-707.

PMID: 18628298 PMC: 2504288. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn446.


References
1.
Sugawara N, Paques F, Colaiacovo M, Haber J . Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(17):9214-9. PMC: 23120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9214. View

2.
Kirkpatrick D, Petes T . Repair of DNA loops involves DNA-mismatch and nucleotide-excision repair proteins. Nature. 1997; 387(6636):929-31. DOI: 10.1038/43225. View

3.
Wong A, Pero R, Ormonde P, Tavtigian S, Bartel P . RAD51 interacts with the evolutionarily conserved BRC motifs in the human breast cancer susceptibility gene brca2. J Biol Chem. 1998; 272(51):31941-4. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.31941. View

4.
Weng Y, Nickoloff J . Evidence for independent mismatch repair processing on opposite sides of a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998; 148(1):59-70. PMC: 1459773. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.59. View

5.
Luhr B, Scheller J, Meyer P, Kramer W . Analysis of in vivo correction of defined mismatches in the DNA mismatch repair mutants msh2, msh3 and msh6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1998; 257(3):362-7. DOI: 10.1007/s004380050658. View