The Specific Architecture of the Anterior Stroma Accounts for Maintenance of Corneal Curvature
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: To analyse the human corneal stroma in extreme hydration to discover if its structure is responsible for corneal stability.
Methods: Corneas in several hydration states were used: postmortem control corneas (PM; n=3), corneas left for 1 day in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; n=4), and corneas left for 1 day (n=4), 2 days (n=4), 3 days (n=2), and 4 days (n=4) in deionised water. All corneas were fixed under standardised conditions and processed for light and electron microscopy. In addition, two fresh corneas from the operating theatre were studied which were processed 6 months after storage in sodium cacodylate buffer.
Results: After 1 day in deionised water maximal stromal swelling was reached which did not change up to 4 days. The stroma of deionised water corneas (1400 microm) was much thicker than that of PBS corneas (650 microm) and PM corneas (450 microm). Deionised water treatment led to disappearance of all keratocytes leaving only remnants of nuclei and large interlamellar spaces. In these specimens the distance between the collagen fibres had increased significantly, but the diameter of the collagen fibres did not seem to be affected. A remarkable observation was that the most anterior part of the stroma (100-120 microm) in all deionised water specimens and those stored for 6 months in buffer was not swollen, indicating that the tightly interwoven anterior lamellae are resistant to extreme non-physiological hydration states.
Conclusions: The rigidity of the most anterior part of the corneal stroma in extreme hydration states points to an important role in maintenance of corneal curvature. Since a large part of this rigid anterior part of the stroma is either removed (PRK) or intersected (LASIK), it is possible that in the long run patients who underwent refractive surgery may be confronted with optical problems.
Photochemical corneal cross-linking: Evaluating the potential of a hand-held biopen.
Usseglio N, Andres J, Marchal J, Moroni L, Nieto D Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101512.
PMID: 39935895 PMC: 11810839. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101512.
Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.
Holzapfel G, Humphrey J, Ogden R J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240361.
PMID: 39876788 PMC: 11775666. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0361.
Rodriguez-Lopez R, Webb J, Erdi M, Kofinas P, Franco W, Zhang H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(13):14.
PMID: 39504051 PMC: 11549923. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.13.14.
Lin H, Chuang Y, Chang S, Lin P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24563.
PMID: 39427010 PMC: 11490556. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76215-1.
Aramberri J, Lauzirika G, Illarramendi I, Mendicute J Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:2831-2841.
PMID: 39398468 PMC: 11471074. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S487627.