» Articles » PMID: 11124670

Interobserver Test-retest Reliability of the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test

Overview
Journal J AAPOS
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2000 Dec 22
PMID 11124670
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Random dot stereoacuity can be quantified to between 40 and 800 seconds of arc in preschool children by using the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, Ill). To incorporate this test into clinic and research settings, the reliability of its stereoacuity scores obtained by separate examiners needs to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its interobserver test-retest reliability.

Methods: Participants included 102 consecutive children with binocular sensory function ranging from fine to no measurable stereopsis. Clinical research participants included children with anomalous binocular vision caused by strabismus, cataracts, anisometropia, and ptosis. In a prospective study, random dot stereoacuity was measured twice under masked testing conditions by 2 examiners within a 1-hour period.

Results: Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test is high among a population of children with diverse binocular sensory function. The correlation coefficient between individual test scores was highly significant (r = 0.97, P<.001). Mean differences between the 2 scores (0.021 log seconds of arc) were not significantly different from zero (t(99) = 1.33, P>.1). The upper and lower limits of agreement were narrow, reflecting both the large sample size and the small variation between the 2 test scores. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test was nearly constant across levels of functional stereoacuity, patient categorization, and age at the time of the test.

Conclusions: The high agreement between the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test scores by 2 independent observers supports its use in clinical management and research settings for the quantitative assessment of binocular sensory vision, as well as in multicentered research studies.

Citing Articles

Risk of Bias When Using Early Failure Criteria in Randomized Clinical Trials With Stereoacuity Outcomes.

Panjwani M, Holmes J Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(12):1.

PMID: 39620862 PMC: 11614026. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.12.1.


Binocular function in patients with intermittent exotropia accompanied by unilateral congenital ptosis.

Choi H, Kim S, Kim S, Ahn J, Lee J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18286.

PMID: 36316386 PMC: 9622878. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23254-1.


Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.

McCaslin A, Vancleef K, Hubert L, Read J, Port N Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9(9):29.

PMID: 32879785 PMC: 7442860. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.29.


Predictive factors for the perceptual learning in stereodeficient subjects.

Portela-Camino J, Martin-Gonzalez S, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Illarramendi-Mendicute I, Pinero D, Garrido-Mercado R J Optom. 2020; 14(2):156-165.

PMID: 32561200 PMC: 8093544. DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.03.001.


Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Read J, Rafiq S, Hugill J, Casanova T, Black C, ONeill A PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224402.

PMID: 31697704 PMC: 6837395. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224402.