» Articles » PMID: 11105762

Dual Role for the RNA-binding Domain of Xenopus Laevis SLBP1 in Histone Pre-mRNA Processing

Overview
Journal RNA
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2000 Dec 6
PMID 11105762
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The replication-dependent histone mRNAs end in a conserved 26-nt sequence that forms a stem-loop structure. This sequence is required for histone pre-mRNA processing and plays a role in multiple aspects of histone mRNA metabolism. Two proteins that bind the 3' end of histone mRNA are found in Xenopus oocytes. xSLBP1 is found in the nucleus, where it functions in histone pre-mRNA processing, and in the cytoplasm, where it may control histone mRNA translation and stability. xSLBP2 is a cytoplasmic protein, inactive in histone pre-mRNA processing, whose expression is restricted to oogenesis and early development. These proteins are similar only in their RNA-binding domains (RBD). A chimeric protein (1-2-1) in which the RBD of xSLBP1 has been replaced with the RBD of xSLBP2 binds the stem-loop with an affinity similar to the original protein. The 1-2-1 protein efficiently localizes to the nucleus of the frog oocyte, but is not active in processing of histone pre-mRNA in vivo. This protein does not support processing in a nuclear extract, but inhibits processing by competing with the active SLBP by binding to the substrate. The 1-2-1 protein also inhibits processing of synthetic histone pre-mRNA injected into frog oocytes, but has no effect on processing of histone pre-mRNA transcribed from an injected histone gene. This result suggests that sequences in the RBD of xSLBP1 give it preferential access to histone pre-mRNA transcribed in vivo.

Citing Articles

U7 snRNP is recruited to histone pre-mRNA in a FLASH-dependent manner by two separate regions of the stem-loop binding protein.

Skrajna A, Yang X, Bucholc K, Zhang J, Hall T, Dadlez M RNA. 2017; 23(6):938-951.

PMID: 28289156 PMC: 5435866. DOI: 10.1261/rna.060806.117.


SLIP1, a factor required for activation of histone mRNA translation by the stem-loop binding protein.

Cakmakci N, Lerner R, Wagner E, Zheng L, Marzluff W Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 28(3):1182-94.

PMID: 18025107 PMC: 2223387. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01500-07.


Formation of the 3' end of histone mRNA: getting closer to the end.

Dominski Z, Marzluff W Gene. 2007; 396(2):373-90.

PMID: 17531405 PMC: 2888136. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.021.


Nuclear export of metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs is dependent on RNA length and is mediated by TAP.

Erkmann J, Sanchez R, Treichel N, Marzluff W, Kutay U RNA. 2004; 11(1):45-58.

PMID: 15611298 PMC: 1370690. DOI: 10.1261/rna.7189205.


The oligo(A) tail on histone mRNA plays an active role in translational silencing of histone mRNA during Xenopus oogenesis.

Sanchez R, Marzluff W Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(6):2513-25.

PMID: 14993288 PMC: 355835. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.6.2513-2525.2004.


References
1.
Frey M, Matera A . Coiled bodies contain U7 small nuclear RNA and associate with specific DNA sequences in interphase human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92(13):5915-9. PMC: 41612. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.13.5915. View

2.
Pandey N, Williams A, Sun J, Brown V, Bond U, Marzluff W . Point mutations in the stem-loop at the 3' end of mouse histone mRNA reduce expression by reducing the efficiency of 3' end formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994; 14(3):1709-20. PMC: 358529. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1709-1720.1994. View

3.
Cho D, Scharl E, Steitz J . Decreasing the distance between the two conserved sequence elements of histone pre-messenger RNA interferes with 3' processing in vitro. RNA. 1995; 1(9):905-14. PMC: 1369339. View

4.
Dominski Z, Sumerel J, Hanson R, Marzluff W . The polyribosomal protein bound to the 3' end of histone mRNA can function in histone pre-mRNA processing. RNA. 1995; 1(9):915-23. PMC: 1369340. View

5.
Hanson R, Sun J, Willis D, Marzluff W . Efficient extraction and partial purification of the polyribosome-associated stem-loop binding protein bound to the 3' end of histone mRNA. Biochemistry. 1996; 35(7):2146-56. DOI: 10.1021/bi9521856. View