» Articles » PMID: 11089467

Absorbed Dose and Deterministic Effects to Patients from Interventional Neuroradiology

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2000 Nov 23
PMID 11089467
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Following the presentation of radiation-induced skin effects by three patients who had undergone glue embolisation of intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM), measurements were made of absorbed dose to the skin of patients undergoing other interventional neuroradiological procedures that involve long fluoroscopy times. The maximum absorbed dose to the skin measured by thermoluminescent dosemeters during these procedures was 4 Gy. From these measurements and from records of fluoroscopy time and the number of digital runs acquired, estimates of the maximum absorbed skin dose were made for the AVM patients. The best estimate of maximum absorbed dose to the skin received by any of the AVM patients during a procedure was 5 Gy, which is consistent with the skin effects presented by the AVM patients, that is temporary epilation and main erythema. Maximum absorbed dose to the skull was estimated to be 45 Gy and to the outer table of the skull 55 Gy. Although it is unlikely that the AVM patients will suffer serious effects from these skin doses, there remains some uncertainty over the risk of long-term effects to the skull. Examination of the fluoroscopy unit showed that the image intensifier was not performing optimally in terms of entrance dose rate and resolution. Replacement of the unit with modern X-ray equipment designed for interventional radiology was prioritized. Operators should be aware of the potential risks to patients from complex interventional neuroradiology procedures and should optimize their procedures to minimize such risks. Patients undergoing prolonged and complex procedures should be counselled regarding the symptoms and risks of large doses of radiation.

Citing Articles

ALARA principles in practice: reduced frame and pulse rates for middle meningeal artery embolization.

Wali A, Sindewald R, Brandel M, Pathuri S, Hirshman B, Bravo J J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024; 26(3):293-297.

PMID: 39091261 PMC: 11449538. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2024.E2024.02.003.


Background Factors Affecting the Radiation Exposure of the Lens of the Eye among Nurses in Interventional Radiology: A Quantitative Observational Study.

Kuriyama T, Moritake T, Nakagami K, Morota K, Hitomi G, Kitamura H Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(1):413-427.

PMID: 38391077 PMC: 10885035. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14010032.


Reducing frame rate and pulse rate for routine diagnostic cerebral angiography: ALARA principles in practice.

Wali A, Pathuri S, Brandel M, Sindewald R, Hirshman B, Bravo J J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023; 26(1):46-50.

PMID: 38092365 PMC: 10995471. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.01.007.


Theoretical derivation and clinical dose-response quantification of a unified multi-activation (UMA) model of cell survival from a logistic equation.

Li S BJR Open. 2021; 3(1):20210040.

PMID: 34877459 PMC: 8611684. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210040.


Patients' Radiation Shielding in Interventional Radiology Settings: A Systematic Review.

El-Diasty M, Olfat A, Mufti A, Alqurashi A, Alghamdi M Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e16870.

PMID: 34513445 PMC: 8412000. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16870.