» Articles » PMID: 1104762

Membrane Resistance Change of the Frog Taste Cells in Response to Water and Nacl

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1975 Dec 1
PMID 1104762
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The electrical properties of the frog taste cells during gustatory stimulations with distilled water and varying concentrations of NaCl were studied with intracellular microelectrodes. Under the Ringer adaptation of the tongue, two types of taste cells were distinguished by the gustatory stimuli. One type, termed NaCl-sensitive (NS) cells, responded to water with hyperpolarizations and responded to concentrated NaCl with depolarizations. In contrast, the other type of cells, termed water-sensitive (WS) cells, responded to water depolarizations and responded to concentrated NaCl with hyperpolarizations. The membrane resistance of both taste cell types increased during the hyperpolarizing receptor potentials and decreased during the depolarizing receptor potentials, Reversal potentials for the depolarizing and hyperpolarizing responses in each cell type were a few millivolts positive above the zero membrane potential. When the tongue was adapted with Na-free Ringer solution for 30 min, the amplitude of the depolarizing responses in the NS cells reduced to 50% of the control value under normal Ringer adaptation. On the basis of the present results, it is concluded (a) that the depolarizing responses of the NS and WS cells under the Ringer adaptation are produced by the permeability increase in some ions, mainly Na+ ions across the taste cell membranes, and (b) that the hyperpolarizing responses of both types of taste cells are produced by a decrease in the cell membrane permeability to some ions, probably Na+ ions, which is slightly enhanced during the Ringer adaptation.

Citing Articles

Enhancement of Gustatory Neural Responses by Parasympathetic Nerve in the Frog.

Sato T, Okada Y Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2017; 38(4):883-890.

PMID: 29103093 PMC: 11481864. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-017-0562-5.


Ionic basis of receptor potential of frog taste cells induced by acid stimuli.

Miyamoto T, Okada Y, Sato T J Physiol. 1988; 405:699-711.

PMID: 3267156 PMC: 1190999. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017356.


Perspectives of taste reception.

Avenet P, Lindemann B J Membr Biol. 1989; 112(1):1-8.

PMID: 2687472 DOI: 10.1007/BF01871158.


Passive and active membrane properties of mudpuppy taste receptor cells.

Kinnamon S, Roper S J Physiol. 1987; 383:601-14.

PMID: 2443655 PMC: 1183092. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016431.


Patch-clamp study of isolated taste receptor cells of the frog.

Avenet P, Lindemann B J Membr Biol. 1987; 97(3):223-40.

PMID: 2442395 DOI: 10.1007/BF01869225.


References
1.
Ottoson D . THE EFFECT OF SODIUM DEFICIENCY ON THE RESPONSE OF THE ISOLATED MUSCLE SPINDLE. J Physiol. 1964; 171:109-18. PMC: 1368780. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007365. View

2.
TATEDA H, BEIDLER L . THE RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE TASTE CELL OF THE RAT. J Gen Physiol. 1964; 47:479-86. PMC: 2195392. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.479. View

3.
Edwards C, Terzuolo C, WASHIZU H . THE EFFECT OF CHANGES OF THE IONIC ENVIRONMENT UPON AN ISOLATED CRUSTACEAN SENSORY NEURON. J Neurophysiol. 1963; 26:948-57. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.948. View

4.
Kimura K, BEIDLER L . Microelectrode study of taste receptors of rat and hamster. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1961; 58:131-9. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1030580204. View

5.
Diamond J, Gray J, Inman D . The relation between receptor potentials and the concentration of sodium ions. J Physiol. 1958; 142(2):382-94. PMC: 1356688. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006024. View