Slavik C, Fish C, Peters E
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024; 11(4):453-467.
PMID: 39320394
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-024-00461-8.
Yang P, Beck D
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(4):1127-1149.
PMID: 37014611
PMC: 10072023.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02703-7.
Sandry J, Ricker T
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022; 7(1):66.
PMID: 35867284
PMC: 9307706.
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00412-7.
Arias D, Saint-Amour D
Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):7566.
PMID: 33828189
PMC: 8027846.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87223-w.
Melnik N, Coates D, Sayim B
J Vis. 2021; 21(3):14.
PMID: 33688921
PMC: 7961119.
DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.3.14.
The role of noun imagery in the speed of processing the grammaticality of adjective-noun phrases.
Grant D, Kadlac J, Schwartz M, Zajano M, Hellige J, Perry L
Mem Cognit. 2013; 5(4):491-8.
PMID: 24203019
DOI: 10.3758/BF03197391.
Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition.
Johns B, Gruenenfelder T, Pisoni D, Jones M
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(2):EL74-80.
PMID: 22894319
PMC: 3401190.
DOI: 10.1121/1.4731641.
Letter search through words and nonwords: The effect of fixed, absent, or mutilated targets.
Krueger L, Weiss M
Mem Cognit. 2011; 4(2):200-6.
PMID: 21287023
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213164.
Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: parallel encoding of chess relations.
Reingold E, Charness N, Schultetus R, Stampe D
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 8(3):504-10.
PMID: 11700901
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196185.
Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: evidence from the letter-superiority effect.
Reingold E, Jolicoeur P
Percept Psychophys. 1993; 53(2):166-78.
PMID: 8433915
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211727.
Repeating the target neither speeds nor slows its detection: evidence for independent channels in letter processing.
Krueger L, Shapiro R
Percept Psychophys. 1980; 28(1):68-76.
PMID: 7413412
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204317.
Phonological and orthographic factors in the word-superiority effect.
Chastain G
Mem Cognit. 1981; 9(4):389-97.
PMID: 7278628
DOI: 10.3758/bf03197564.
Word superiority in word detection.
Staller J
Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(3):237-42.
PMID: 7088665
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202528.
The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception.
Appelman I, MAYZNER M
Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(5):436-46.
PMID: 7036082
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204839.
Effect of letter orientation and sequential redundancy on the speed of letter search.
Greenberg S, Krueger L
Mem Cognit. 1983; 11(2):181-91.
PMID: 6865752
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213473.
Proofreading familiar text: constraints on visual processing.
Levy B
Mem Cognit. 1983; 11(1):1-12.
PMID: 6855552
DOI: 10.3758/bf03197655.
The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences.
Krueger L
Percept Psychophys. 1984; 35(6):558-64.
PMID: 6483559
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205953.
A word-superiority effect with print and braille characters.
Krueger L
Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(4):345-52.
PMID: 6213928
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202658.
Effect of intermixed foveal and parafoveal presentation on same-different judgments: evidence for a criterion-inertia model.
Krueger L
Percept Psychophys. 1985; 37(3):266-71.
PMID: 4022758
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207574.
Two types of word superiority effects in a speeded matching task.
Silverman W
Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(1):50-6.
PMID: 4010514
DOI: 10.3758/bf03198443.
