» Articles » PMID: 11003256

Examination of Four Different Instruments for Measuring Blood Lactate Concentration

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Science
Date 2000 Sep 26
PMID 11003256
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Information on the performance of different instruments used to measure blood lactate concentration is incomplete. We therefore examined instruments from Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI 23L and YSI 1500) and three cheaper and simpler instruments: Dr. Lange's LP8+, Lactate Pro from Arkray in the KDK corporation and Accusport from Boehringer Mannheim. First, a number of blood samples were analysed by standard enzymatic photofluorometry (our reference method) and, in addition, by one or more of the instruments mentioned above. Second, measurements using two or more identical instruments were compared. Third, since Lactate Pro and Accusport are small (approximately 100 g, pocket-size), battery-driven, instruments that could be used for outdoor testing, the performance of these instruments was examined at simulated altitudes (O2 pressure of <10 kPa) and at temperatures below -20 degrees C, while screening the instruments as much as possible from the cold. Most of the different instruments showed systematically too high or too low values (10-25% deviation). The observed differences between instruments may affect the "blood lactate threshold" by 2-5%. We found different readings between "equal" YSI 1500 instruments, while we could see no difference when comparing the other instruments of the same type. Lactate Pro gave reliable results at both -21+/-1 degrees C and at simulated altitude. Accusport gave reliable results in the cold, but 1.85+/-0.08 mmol L(-1) (mean+/-SD) too high readings at the simulated altitude. Of the three simpler instruments examined, the Lactate Pro was at least as good as the YSI instruments and superior to the other two.

Citing Articles

Precision and accuracy of four handheld blood lactate analyzers across low to high exercise intensities.

Mentzoni F, Skaugen M, Eythorsdottir I, Roterud S, Johansen E, Losnegard T Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(12):3781-3788.

PMID: 39158591 PMC: 11568978. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05572-6.


Mental, physical, and phychophysiological responses to FFP2/N95 face mask during HIIT in active women.

Tannion K, de la Vega R, Horcajo J, Cuadrado-Penafiel V PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0292061.

PMID: 37773935 PMC: 10540954. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292061.


Performance-related physiological changes induced by one year of endurance training in young athletes.

Mishica C, Kyrolainen H, Valtonen M, Holmberg H, Linnamo V Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1149968.

PMID: 37234748 PMC: 10206302. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1149968.


Examination of the ZXY Arena Tracking System for Association Football Pitches.

Medbo J, Ylvisaker E Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(6).

PMID: 36991890 PMC: 10056700. DOI: 10.3390/s23063179.


Effect of Computational Method on Accumulated O Deficit.

Medbo J, Welde B Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:772049.

PMID: 35321523 PMC: 8936074. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.772049.