» Articles » PMID: 10924204

Habituation and Development of Response Specificity to a Sign Stimulus: Male Preference for Female Courtship Posture in Stickleback

Overview
Journal Anim Behav
Date 2000 Aug 5
PMID 10924204
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

I examined biased patterns of habituation that occur when reproductive male three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, respond to a choice of two dummy females, one displaying the head-up posture of a sexually receptive female and an otherwise identical dummy lacking this sign stimulus (i.e. a dummy in a 'neutral' horizontal posture). Males initially courted both dummies about equally, but within 5 min, their courtship to the horizontal dummy began to habituate and was eventually replaced by attack behaviour, which increased about four-fold during the 1-h trial. Courtship to the head-up dummy continued unabated throughout the trial and by 5 min exceeded courtship to the horizontal dummy. Attack to the head-up dummy increased slightly in the first half of the trial then leveled off to about one-third that directed to the horizontal dummy. Both dummies were stationary and unreactive so could not directly provide differential feedback to the males. It is speculated that the self-arousal males obtain when responding to head-up posture reinforces their response to that cue. The salience of this sign stimulus may develop through an interactive process wherein the male's predisposition to recognize and court the head-up posture and the sexual self-arousal he obtains by doing so counter habituation and help maintain his sexual response to that cue. The stimulus-response specificity of male courtship is assumed to have an innate basis but requires experience to become fully differentiated. The results also illustrate that rate or extent of habituation to different stimuli, even on the same dimension, can differ within the same individual and in an adaptive manner. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Citing Articles

Does paternal care influence mate preference? Male and female mating behavior in Threespine Stickleback ecotypes that differ markedly in parental care.

Corney R, Weir L Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(3):e9953.

PMID: 36998604 PMC: 10049857. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9953.


Habitat change alters the expression and efficiency of a female ornament.

Backroos S, Ala-Ilomaki L, Candolin U Behav Ecol. 2022; 33(6):1133-1140.

PMID: 36518636 PMC: 9735238. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac080.


Nest construction and presence do not alter territorial aggression in male threespine stickleback.

James N, Furukawa M Anim Behav. 2020; 166:9-17.

PMID: 32655149 PMC: 7351080. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.05.010.


Molecular mechanisms and the conflict between courtship and aggression in three-spined sticklebacks.

Sanogo Y, Bell A Mol Ecol. 2016; 25(17):4368-76.

PMID: 27452346 PMC: 5021609. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13766.


Individual variation in habituation: behaviour over time toward different stimuli in threespine sticklebacks ().

Bell A, Peeke H Behaviour. 2015; 149(13-14):1339-1365.

PMID: 25678715 PMC: 4323190. DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003019.