Impact of a Telephone Helpline for Smokers Who Called During a Mass Media Campaign
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a telephone helpline (Quitline) with additional support (written information) on callers who use the service during a mass media campaign.
Design: Telephone recall surveys of callers to the helpline carried out two months and one year after their initial call.
Setting: Telephone helpline.
Subjects: Callers to the helpline.
Main Outcome Measures: Smoking behaviour change among callers to the helpline at two months and one year.
Results: At one year 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.4% to 25.6%) of smokers reported that they had stopped smoking. Assuming that those who refuse to take part in the one year follow up are continuing smokers and a further 20% of reported successes fail biochemical validation, this yields an adjusted quit rate of 15. 6% (95% CI 12.7% to 18.9%) at one year. Among ex-smokers, 41% (95% CI 34.3% to 47.7%) reported that they were still not smoking at one year. The adjusted figure for ex-smokers at one year is 29% (95% CI 23.3% to 34.8%). Of those who resumed smoking 28% were smoking less than they had been initially. Currently Quitline receives around half a million calls in the course of one year, 93% of whom are phoning for themselves. This represents 4.2% of the total population of adults smokers in England.
Conclusion: The Health Education Authority's advertising campaign was extremely successful in generating calls to the helpline. Very large numbers of smokers from diverse backgrounds, including the key groups highlighted in the UK government's recent proposals on tobacco, called the Quitline, which appeared to be very successful in helping these callers to stop smoking. For a single intervention to reach 4.2% of the total population of adult smokers in England is a major achievement. This makes Quitline a very promising model for public health intervention programs.
Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.
PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.
Wirtz M, Stanton A, Manohar R, Labbe A, Zvolensky M, Smits J J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023; 84(5):772-780.
PMID: 37219036 PMC: 10600974. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.22-00318.
Stich C, Lasnier B, Lo E Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2021; 41(7-8):222-229.
PMID: 34427420 PMC: 8428720. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.41.7/8.03.
Byaruhanga J, Atorkey P, McLaughlin M, Brown A, Byrnes E, Paul C J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(9):e18621.
PMID: 32915156 PMC: 7519427. DOI: 10.2196/18621.
Influence of new tobacco control policies and campaigns on Quitline call volume in Korea.
Park J, Minh L, Shin S, Oh J, Yun E, Lee D Tob Induc Dis. 2019; 17:21.
PMID: 31582932 PMC: 6751995. DOI: 10.18332/tid/104674.