» Articles » PMID: 10807460

Influence of Treatment Modality on Angiographic Outcome After Coronary Stenting in Diabetic Patients: a Controlled Study

Overview
Date 2000 May 12
PMID 10807460
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective study was designed to determine the six-month angiographic outcome after stenting of native coronary arteries in insulin-treated (ITDM) and non-ITDM patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and compare the results with those in non-DM patients.

Background: The influence of the treatment modality for DM on restenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting has not been elucidated sufficiently.

Methods: A total of 1,439 (70%) of 2,061 patients underwent repeated angiography within six months of coronary stenting. The ITDM and non-ITDM (oral hypoglycemic drugs or diet) were documented in 48 (3.3%) and 177 patients (12.3%), respectively, leaving 1,214 non-DM patients.

Results: Baseline reference vessel diameter tended to be smaller in ITDM patients (mean, 2.73 mm) than in non-DM and non-ITDM patients (2.88 mm and 2.85 mm, respectively). However, percent diameter stenosis was not different. The median number of stents deployed was 1; median stent length was 15 mm. Statistically significant differences were present after stenting for the means of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and acute gain between ITDM patients (MLD: 2.67 mm, acute gain: 1.98 mm) and non-DM patients (MLD: 2.81 mm, acute gain: 2.16 mm). At follow-up, percent diameter stenosis, late lumen loss and loss index were significantly higher in both non-ITDM lesions (42%, 1.14 mm and 0.56, respectively) and ITDM lesions (48%, 1.26 mm and 0.65, respectively) than in non-DM lesions (35%, 0.96 mm and 0.45, respectively). The corresponding differences between non-ITDM and ITDM lesions did not reach statistical significance. Restenosis rates in non-DM, non-ITDM and ITDM lesions were 23.8%, 32.8% (p = 0.013 vs. non-DM) and 39.6% (p = 0.02 vs. non-DM, p = 0.477 vs. non-ITDM), respectively.

Conclusions: This study showed that compared with stenting in non-DM patients, stenting of native coronary arteries in DM patients is associated with significantly increased lumen renarrowing, regardless of the treatment modality for DM.

Citing Articles

Short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in insulin-treated versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hassan W, Saquib J, Khatri M, Kazmi S, Kotak S, Hassan H Indian Heart J. 2021; 74(1):13-21.

PMID: 34906538 PMC: 8890999. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.12.004.


Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study.

Tang X, Ma Y, Song Y, Xu J, Yao Y, He C Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018; 17(1):114.

PMID: 30107794 PMC: 6090623. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-018-0758-0.


Adverse cardiovascular outcomes between insulin-treated and non-insulin treated diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bundhun P, Li N, Chen M Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015; 14:135.

PMID: 26446829 PMC: 4597459. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-015-0300-6.


Optimal choice of coronary revascularization and stent type in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Harskamp R, Park D Cardiol Ther. 2014; 2(1):69-84.

PMID: 25135290 PMC: 4107438. DOI: 10.1007/s40119-013-0014-3.


Outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion.

Sohrabi B, Ghaffari S, Habibzadeh A, Chaichi P J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013; 3(2):45-8.

PMID: 24250951 PMC: 3825329. DOI: 10.5681/jcvtr.2011.009.