» Articles » PMID: 10616094

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Central and Peripheral Deafferentation Pain. Report of Eight Cases

Overview
Journal J Neurosurg
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2000 Jan 1
PMID 10616094
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation protocol for treatment of central and peripheral types of deafferentation pain. Four patients with thalamic pain and four with peripheral deafferentation pain were studied. Preoperative pharmacological tests of pain relief were performed using phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, and placebo. In five patients we placed a 20- or 40-electrode grid in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief for a few weeks before definitive placement of a four-electrode array. In three patients, the four-electrode array was implanted in the interhemispheric fissure as a one-stage procedure to treat lower-extremity pain. In two patients with pain extending from the extremity to the trunk or hip, dual devices were implanted to drive two electrodes. Six of eight patients experienced pain reduction (two each with excellent, good, and fair relief) from motor cortex stimulation. No correlation was apparent between pharmacological test results and the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. Patients with peripheral deafferentation pain, including two with phantom-limb pain and two with brachial plexus injury, attained pain relief from motor cortex stimulation, with excellent results in two cases. Testing performed with a subdural multiple-electrode grid was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief. Motor cortex stimulation may be effective for treating peripheral as well as central deafferentation pain.

Citing Articles

Motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain treatment.

Fagundes W, Lobo K, Rajab N, Reyns N, Laureau E, Blond S Surg Neurol Int. 2025; 16:48.

PMID: 40041061 PMC: 11878713. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_1022_2024.


Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation focusing on patients with neuropathic pain in the upper limb: a randomized sham-controlled parallel trial.

Mori N, Hosomi K, Nishi A, Miyake A, Yamada T, Matsugi A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11811.

PMID: 38782994 PMC: 11116497. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62018-x.


Difference in Analgesic Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation According to the Site of Pain.

Mori N, Hosomi K, Nishi A, Dong D, Yanagisawa T, Khoo H Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:786225.

PMID: 34899224 PMC: 8662379. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.786225.


Pre-motor versus motor cerebral cortex neuromodulation for chronic neuropathic pain.

Lavrov I, Latypov T, Mukhametova E, Lundstrom B, Sandroni P, Lee K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12688.

PMID: 34135363 PMC: 8209192. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91872-2.


Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Henssen D, Kurt E, van Walsum A, Kozicz T, van Dongen R, Bartels R Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):7195.

PMID: 32346080 PMC: 7189245. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64177-z.